Jump to content

Recommended Posts

there was a serious accident in peckham this morning, from what i gather a lady was under a lorry. all buses were on diversion & other traffic..... alot of drama in the streets of south east today!


there was also an incident in new cross today.... more traffic!


any news on either incidents??

This was truly horrendous. I got their a couple of hours after the unfortunate Ladies body was taken away. Another cyclist crushed to death trying to pass an artic lorry on the inside at a corner. The bike was still under the wheels...as were a pair of shoes. Tragic and Sobering.

It's a Volvo truck with two containers. What on earth this vehicle was doing turning into theat road....

Southwark News says:" A lorry driver has been arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving."



From the company website:

---

"RPS Transport is an East of England based transport company with depots in Suffolk and Norfolk. Specialising in container transport, RPS operates primarily out of Felixstowe Docks for clients across mainland UK.


With a fleet of 16 modern Volvo trucks equipped with state-of-the-art tracking equipment, RPS is unique for its size in that it provides customers with

up-to-the-minute information about the location of their cargo.


As professionals in Container Haulage, RPS believes in raising the standard of container transport services by operating a modern fleet of vehicles equipped with the latest Euro spec engines designed to run in an efficient and environmentally friendly manner."

---


Raising the standard, eh?

dv1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So you already decided the driver was at fault.

> The arrest is standard practice in such indidents

> - doesn't mean he is guilty.


Being arrested on "suspicion of dangerous driving" is not standard. Most people involved in road accidents do not have that happen to them. It merits a mandatory driving disqualification if found guilty (whatever happens to the victom), which again is uncommon. There are many deaths on the road where the driver is at fault but not arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving (but of a lesser offence).


I know the streets concerned, as a motorist and as a cyclist, and I'm fairly surprised this vehicle did what it did, TBH. But that's my opinion.


My point was really about lots of guff about standards of the modern trucks and the environment etc. That's what their text is about. Transportation is not all about powerful engines and GPS and all that CSR stuff. As the number of women cyclists who have recently been killed on London streets by such trucks (check it out) could probably testify.

A couple of weeks ago the City police held an initiative inviting cyclists to see themselves from a lorry drivers point of view. They had a Eddie Stobart wagon parked up in a side street and the idea was that you sat up in the drivers seat while an officer walked down the inside lane with your bike, just like an 'undertaking' cyclist, while you watched for him in the rear view mirrors. I didn't take it too seriously but thought well, why not?

It was a shock- even when specifically watching out for the guy he could barely be seen. No more than a tiny speck, even with the huge mirrors & convex mirrors. When the bike could be seen it's also impossible to gauge its speed, and the blind spot on these things is immense.

My point is not so much to comment on this specific incident but just a heads up as to just how much of a wide berth these lorries need to be given.

I don't know the details and I'm not passing judgement on anyone's driving/cycling in this situation, but there are a lot of inexperienced people who think they can just jump on a bike and ride merrily around London.


I regularly see cyclists blithely riding up the inside of large vehicles unaware of the danger they could be in.


There is free cycle training available and really, people should use it.

So is she still alive? I was there when it happened the shriek was horrible i think the bus i was on was the last bus to pass through, when i was there one of her legs was under it, it was disgusting how the school kids reacted, laughing then i heard one say "i'm watching this, i don't care if im late!" felt like punching one of them, that stuck with me through the whole day even my exam. >.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...