Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes it is sad - so much for British people supporting British tennis - think this shows that it was always English tennis the Wimbledon public wanted to support and few of them give a hoot about Murray. Some say its because he says he does not support the English football team but thats just an excuse not to support him, at the end if the day he won't get the same support as Henman because he is not English.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218087
Share on other sites

I think that's nonsense. The English are far less bothered about any kind of English / Scottish divide than the Scots.


Murray doesn't get the support Tim Henman did because he doesn't play the same PR game. He has been moody and lacked charm and any willingness to engage with fans. That's starting to change now, and it'll only take his playing nicely with the fans at one Wimbledon for people to get hehind him.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218089
Share on other sites

is it not quite sad and pathetic that people shout that and come on rafa in a murray game?


I think Murray has some support in England - but the "Come on Tim" shouts show that he has a long way to go, the fans are telling him he will never have the place in their gearts that Henman had, which is harsh - not to support him is one thing but actively distracting him is another.


He is not as likeable as Henman perhaps - but then Henman was a loser and Murray is a winner.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218101
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He is not as likeable as Henman perhaps - but then

> Henman was a loser and Murray is a winner.


And perhaps therin lies the problem - there does seem to be a tendancy to like support the plucky underdog rather than the winner in this country. I totally agree with the point Rosie makes about the England / Scotland divide too. Course Murray didn't make himself very popular early on when he made that comment about not wanting to support England in the football - but he was something like 19 at the time - how many guys of that age always talk sense?


Personally I prefer Murray to Henman - the latter just never seemed to care enough when he lost and so would always ultimately be a loser in the biggest of games. Wheras I was lucky enough to be at Wimbledon to see Murray play David Nalbandian back in 2005 and despite the odds being stacked in the latter's favour, you could tell Murray was really annoyed with himself that he missed his chances to win the match, even though he was ranked way lower than Nalbandian.


Tim never seemed to face up to the fact he wasn't strong enough to compete at the absolute top level - Sampras would always get the better of him in a tie breaker because he could rain down more aces. Tim never looked like he had the strength of other top players.


Murray on the other hand has put some serious effort into his strength training - ok he isn't quite a Nadal, but he's got the strength now to finish off a big game that he didn't have when he was playing Nalbandian, you can really see the difference in his power and fitness now.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218106
Share on other sites

I think that's nonsense. The English are far less bothered about any kind of English / Scottish divide than the Scots.



Can I point out that that is probably because the Scots didn't spend several hundred years trying to take over England and kill the English queen while they were at it.


Not that they can hold a grudge now what with most of central parliament top jobs being held by Scots *snigger*


COME ON ANDY!!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218121
Share on other sites

Asset, if it wasn't for the English bringing the Jocks to heel then they wouldn't be the nation/people that they are today. Oh and they'll get their full independance/home rule back when we the English get our shop doorways back. I mean come on.....they drink the blood of their dead for god sake.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218122
Share on other sites

Can I point out that that is probably because the Scots didn't spend several hundred years trying to take over England and kill the English queen while they were at it.


Anyone who honestly holds that against the average English person today, is a tw@t in my opinion.


I work with a Scots lass, and she says there is a feeling that Scotland is just forgotten, even in Scotland, they are overwhelmed with English footy, for example, yet it's difficult to watch a team other than old firm, when you're down here. She also said that she feels Scotland is the guinea pig country, where things are tried out, like the smoking ban.


My only problem with Scotland is Alex Salmond. What a vile little man he is!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218139
Share on other sites

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I point out that that is probably because the

> Scots didn't spend several hundred years trying to

> take over England and kill the English queen while

> they were at it.


I would thought they should have been happy that they got the last laugh when they got to take over England without a fight when Elizabeth I died without a child of her own.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6790-come-on-tim/#findComment-218146
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry to hear you are having issues. Fwiw, we received a regular letter this week. Maybe it's worth asking at the Dulwich delivery office (it's in West Dulwich, though. Their phone number is 03457740740) to see if there are aware of any issues in your particular area?  I've seen cases in the past were the a particular postie was sick and they didn't cover for them, they just let everything accumulate for a couple of days until the person was back.
    • Mal, it is related to this issue and if you scroll back a few pages you will see that Brockwell was brought up in relation to this (not by me I hasten to add). Do you not think it seems perfectly reasonable for people to be able to reference a neighbouring event - one that is having a number of challenges not too dissimilar to the ones Gala is having?     These sentences from the BrixtonBuzz article I linked seem very pertinent too:  The concern, they argue, is not just about permits, but about the Council’s repeated failure to follow proper planning processes and its habit of acting in the interests of commercial promoters rather than the local community.   And this: The group is now calling on residents to write to their local MP and councillors, accusing the Council of using legal mechanisms to avoid scrutiny.
    • Mal, like it or not, it does have some bearing on other councils. There was an item about it on Times Radio on Sunday - Kate Borsay, a presenter who lives locally, referenced Peckham Rye in relation to the Brockwell case. As the reporter pointed out, local councils will all be talking to each other and closely following how things unfold. If a precedent is set with Brockwell, other councils will be under greater scrutiny. 
    • Why don't you start a new thread about Brockwell Park?  I promise that I won't post on it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...