Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be honest they might as well dispense with the

> formalities, wheel-on an enormous phallus at the

> start of the show for them to intermittently gawp

> at, and then spend the next hour drinking sweet

> white wine and flicking through 'Heat' whilst they

> get their hair done.



Whilst smoking 40 Rothmans.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218840
Share on other sites

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> Cackling, screeching, end-of-the-pier,

> faked-tanned, Sheila's-Wheels insured, leering

> harpies.

>

> Does this or does this not mean that you like teh

> ( see what I did there) show "Bob"sy?


-------------------------------------------------------------




teh ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218898
Share on other sites

God, what a bunch of snobs! - what you have described is often the behaviour of lots of women on a girls night out - whether that's a bunch of perma tanned Essex girls or a bunch of yummy mummies knocking back the vino in Black Cherry.


I totally get it and I love it and not really sure why it's a big secret to be 'admitted' to.....lots of my friends love it too, all educated, bright ladies with careers, blah, blah,blah....


And I'm not surprised that you men don't like it and don't get it, you're not expected to.....and according to most blokes, women that are loud and having a good time without you are trampy 'cackling' harlots, etc, etc....maybe they just scare you a little?...Oh who cares, I love watching it if I'm around, makes me laugh and cheers me up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218974
Share on other sites

emc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God, what a bunch of snobs! - what you have

> described is often the behaviour of lots of women

> on a girls night out


Exactly.


Thus proving the rule that if you put more than six people of the same sex in a room and give them half a shandy each, they'll either get their tits out, or start comparing cock sizes (metaphorically speaking, of course).


However - fair do's - I'm prepared to admit it's current scheduling slot makes it the most exciting thing on television at that time (unless you're really into Bargain Hunt)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-218995
Share on other sites

I have watched snippets of it when Bargain Hunt started to flag, or when I needed a break from one of Tim W's more outre weskits, so I suppose I'm not really in a position to give a fair and balanced view of the show.

But shag all that, I won't attempt to then.

What a desperate, blowsy bunch of superannuated wannabe ladettes.

All they need is a guest spot from Jenny Eclair to make the whole grisly package complete.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6832-loose-women/#findComment-219135
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...