Jump to content

What is wrong with this forum? (non ED issues being moved to Lounge)


Recommended Posts

It is more work to split it but once split it should hopefully be better and the turnover of the pages would be slower as currently they move too fast.


I forgot to say there would also be a Lost and Found cats section too. Perhaps not, I guess they would go in the wanted section.

Debating chamber may scare people off. I reckon it should be a place for grown up discussion rather than specifically for formal debate though I hope much occurs.


Any good suggestions, I always liked the drawing room, though that might be a bit stuffy too.

I think that's an option for another section GSJ57, but it could be a good idea but Camberwell and Nunhead both have their own forums and we shouldn't take away from them.


So the purpose of the new section/room is for people to discuss general, non East Dulwich specific, issues and not a place for games and silliness. Some will call it boring and so they can stay away, some will try to inject their stupid opinion and then cry foul when they get told off but they should be used to that. Trouble makers will simply be banned from the section at the Chairman's discretion.


Name ideas so far:

Drawing room

Debating room

Back Bar

Non-East Dulwich issues

Discussion Debate


All sensible ideas warmly accepted

Debating room won't be policeable IMO and sometimes the irreverant posts on a worthy thread work fine too although occasionally kill it. And if it does get policed properly irreverant posts - some of which are very funny - will tend to go so we'll be left with valuable information and worthy debates only with less spontanity (good and crap), a pity I think but many probably wont........I don't think the EDF is broke NO TINKERING

I'm not so sure quids. I think it'll be good to have an area where the anything goes mentality is gone. That doesn't mean comment can't be light hearted or witty especially if it helps diffuse tension, but it must be at the least relevant.


With the levels of traffic it will still depend on he user community to police it and report unwanted posts, but it needent be dull and worthy, but serve two purposes of allowing conversation without malicious disruption plus a place to have 'serious' perhaps local issues that aren't ED specific.


I think it'll also allow good threads to remain visible rather than sink beneath the weight of word games and err lighthearted threads.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably just appointed, someone has already

> expressed an interest (in fact they suggested the

> serious room a while back when the Lounge became

> predominantly silly for a period). Don't worry,

> they're good and fair.



May I ask then, that the chair (when appointed), be named. It is not the same role as moderator, and I think it's only fair for people to know who their chair is.


I didn't realise people could put their names forward, but I think I'd be interested too. Perhaps, it should change regularly. I know it's a different thing, but when I have been part of a group that has met regularly, and kept the same chair for ages, it became stale, and turned to the chair's agenda. I think it's nice to shake things up occasionally with new blood.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He/she followed me and my friends quite a long way along the road so we worried they might be out of their catchment area. Quite dusty paws which also made me think perhaps they’d been roaming away from home for a few days. Took photos in case anyone is missing them! Very pretty, friendly long-haired black and white cat, leopard print collar, pink paw-print metal tag. They eventually stopped following us across the road from Mrs Robinson.
    • I took it to mean that he was going to present all sides of the argument (for want of a better term) rather than just giving his own opinion. I didn't take it to mean that he was calling "his own views" balanced.
    • I just did this survey. There are a number of problems with it. For example, in at least two questions you have an option "other, please specify" but there is no way to specify what the "other" is. Also, you have several questions where if you have nothing appropriate to answer, you get a statement "this is a required question", or words to that effect, so you have to put in something like "nothing" in order to move on. Can I suggest that this is likely to confuse people so they just give up half way through? Maybe you should test it out on a few people before going "live" with it?
    • I went to Brockwell Lido on a hot day last summer to do some lengths. It was busy.  I kept getting other people's hair, which was floating around the pool, tangled in my hands. It was gross. I'm not sure if that was unusual, or if it's always like that on a hot day. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...