Jump to content

Recommended Posts

what has happened here? this used to be sparkling clean and aesthetically pleasing with good stock albeit tres expensive but we shopped there for that reason, ie unique clothes and accessories. this week there were 3 tiny plastic ducks for a childs bath for ?1 each! on the shelf and tatty shoes and gritty dirty shelves. The quality and aesthetics have plummeted. Its all very well having high end designer clothes and shoes donated but frankly if they are over 7 years old then perhaps they should be on a vintage rail and not presented as current. And whyare there low end garments more expensive than sold in the original low end store. There are other charity shops in which to source low end clothes but not what we expect from MLAGS

stores.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/70549-save-the-children-charity-shop/
Share on other sites

I saw a pair of Jimmy Choos in there the other week!


I've donated to Save the Children recently, I donated items from the 'more expensive' end of my wardrobe, e.g. stuff from Coast and very nice dresses from Warehouse. Appreciate both these shops are high street and not designer, I still felt the quality of the items was more suitable for Save the Children than the other charity shops we have. I always enjoy a browse and am often surprised at some of the stuff people are prepared to donate when they could get a decent amount of money themselves on eBay.

I found children's clothes in there from a multipack being sold as single items for a higher price than the original shop.


One example was baby grows from Sainsburys which were selling for ?2 each when they are ?6 for five as a multipack.


Agree it's great to donate to charity but don't agree it should be more expensive than buying items from the original seller, whether they are new or secondhand. Feels dishonest to me?


And I found secondhand muslins in a bundle which were dirty... :(


Angharad

I've donated some higher end items that I could well have made money from on eBay (Nicole Farhi, Toast, Cos) but decided I'd rather make a contribution to this worthwhile charity. I recently got an email to say that so far my items have raised over ?150. That's much more than I would have donated directly. I don't have money to burn and could have put that sum to good use had I got that from eBay sales but I think Save the Children will put it to much better use.

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They were asking ?290 for a "vintage" mirror that

> was obviously new, which is probably against

> various trading laws.. ?290 would have been very

> expensive even if t was old. Still, if someone was

> daft enough to part with their money......



I guess that is what they are banking on.


I've only been in there once. Saw their prices and came straight out again :(

Not unreasonable when running a multi-billion ? organisation that reaches many millions of children worldwide. Pay peanuts you get monkeys.


HerneHill81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, they need the money. Their Chief Executive's

> salary is over ?130,000 per annum. Give

> generously, folks!

I agree....my friend holds a senior position at Save and she's the hardest working person I know, often in the office til midnight working on deadlines, at weekends too, and altho on a decent salary it doesn't compare to people I have worked with in the city who do much less.....





Not unreasonable when running a multi-billion ? organisation that reaches many millions of children worldwide. Pay peanuts you get monkeys.


HerneHill81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, they need the money. Their Chief Executive's

> salary is over ?130,000 per annum. Give

> generously, folks!




Not unreasonable when running a multi-billion ? organisation that reaches many millions of children worldwide. Pay peanuts you get monkeys.


HerneHill81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, they need the money. Their Chief Executive's

> salary is over ?130,000 per annum. Give

> generously, folks!

I guess charity shops are driven by what people donate, and there was a piece in The Guardian today mentioning this which may be relevant -


"The rise of discounters such as Aldi, Lidl and Primark has played a role in both factors. Not only have they increased competition for charity shops, but the growing popularity of cut-price clothing means the quality of the garments in people?s wardrobes is not what it was. So, when a household clears out its wardrobes, unwanted clothing is more likely to go in the bin than be taken to the charity shop. Oxfam said that donations fell by 2% last year."


Full article here - http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/14/oxfam-tough-test-new-era-lidl-aldi-primark

Hi everyone,


As a volunteer of the shop mentioned here, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise if any of you are unhappy with your experience of Living & Giving. It is a really wonderful shop to work for and we all work very hard to provide quality products at great prices for our very valued customers.


We strive to only sell items that fit within the MLAG ethos, but as I'm sure you will all understand, sometimes differences of opinion on price, label and quality can sometimes (and hopefully, rarely!) occur, especially when we are introducing new volunteers into the team. Great care is taken with training to make sure this is only transitory. We are EXTREMELY picky about what goes onto the shop floor, from the huge number of donations we have each week. Anything not suitable for MLAG goes straight to a Save The Children shop, so we are really taking care to make the shop look as amazing as possible. It would be very hard for us to have a dedicated area to vintage as the shop is small and we only actually receive truly vintage clothes sporadically.


Any damaged, dirty or wrongfully priced items are swiftly dealt with and we are always happy to discuss any items you are not happy with. We're a very friendly bunch of people, so please don't be afraid to point things out to us! I personally was told about the mirror and we have rectified the error, so apologies to all who were upset by this.


We also now have a fantastic NEW manager (after a long search) that is now making sure MLAG is a wonderful place for you all to donate and shop on Lordship Lane....I hope you will all continue to support the work we try and do to raise as much money as possible for the charity.


Anyone is welcome to volunteer (only the managerial position is salaried) and you only need to give 4 hours of your time per week. Please feel free to pop by and pick up a form to join us and see for yourselves the work we do.

  • 2 weeks later...

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They were asking ?290 for a "vintage" mirror that

> was obviously new, which is probably against

> various trading laws.. ?290 would have been very

> expensive even if t was old. Still, if someone was

> daft enough to part with their money......



Is there supposed to be a decimal pint in there? If not they are having a laugh. I don't expect to find things that expensive in a charityshop.

  • 3 weeks later...

Jacqui5254 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I imagine it is a reflection of the donations

> received.

>

> How many people actually have donated 'high end

> designer clothes and shoes' since the shop opened?


Me, I donate to Save the Children and my wardrobe is pretty high-end. I think they were most likely my Choos that someone spotted. Ebay isn't for everyone; I don't like ebay and I don't use it. I'd much rather have a charity make money than a big corporate take a large cut of the profits. If I'm donating something that I paid ???? for then I want the charity to make as much money as possible.

SoozieW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lynne Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > They were asking ?290 for a "vintage" mirror

> that

> > was obviously new, which is probably against

> > various trading laws.. ?290 would have been

> very

> > expensive even if t was old. Still, if someone

> was

> > daft enough to part with their money......

>

>

> Is there supposed to be a decimal pint in there?

> If not they are having a laugh. I don't expect to

> find things that expensive in a charityshop.


Good point Soozie but as a volunteer in a charity shop not a million miles away, I have to say we receive the most eclectic mix of donations it's possible to have-some items are personally pointed out by the donor as being worth a fair amount and we have to respect that and get as good a price as we can. For example-jewellery, new with tags designer items or fantastic pieces of furniture. It's a fine balance between honouring the donor, maximising money for our charity and keeping customer's happy so they'll come back!

This might be a good opportunity to remind us all to donate some of our unwanted [and decent!] things.


Or donate as an option to helping with the refugee crisis.



http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/about-us/emergencies/child-refugee-crisis-appeal?utm_campaign=refugee&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=refugeecrisisappealppc&sissr=1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...