Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

(and not just high-rolling kings of the

> universe like Mr Ben).


If kings of the universe drive battered 1993 Ford Escorts (that's 1.8 LXi with Spoiler, Ladies) then that's an apt description Ted.


And when I'm not high rolling it down the lane to Tesco's in that, I'm backing up my little Macbook with Apples easy to use Time Machine software and a 320 MB external drive.


I learned the hard way.

jollybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One of my good friend's house burned to the ground

> when she was three or four and so she has never

> seen any of her baby photos - I've always thought

> that was really sad.


Tell her not to worry, she looked like Winston Churchill. All babies do.

My original post wasn't to really talk about "losing" things, nor was it a chicken-licken "everything could go wrong and probably will so lets worry worry" post a la Jeremy's suggestion


It was more that people haven't thought through any of the implications of this migration from physical to virtual - and then, bang on cue , people on facebook start throwing up their arms in disgust about something they think is news, even tho they have all installed a million facebook applets where they had to tick a box saying they agree to let each applet access and share their private info


On the one hand I think people deserve what they get, but on the other I think this is a tiny foretaste of something much bigger to come

What are the chances, my lovely PC gave up the ghost, hard drive kaput.

A few photos not backed up but otherwise just annoyed at loss of slightly dodgy installation of CS3 (from previous work) and didn't back up my iTunes XML export file or artwork meaning I'll have to dig around for about 500 blimmin album covers.


If anyone still has an AGP motherboard out there then my graphics card was the pinnacle of AGP gaming technology (Radeon X800 if memory serves) and are more than welcome to it, be a pity to see it go to waste.

Sorry Mockney, are you genuinely concerned about retrieving lost data because from the way you describe it looks as though you're showing your 'equipment' off...again.


Still, I suppose it's better than having HonaloochieB's typewriter wedded with an old microfiche that's somehow got internet connection.

It's a five year old graphics card based on a completely obsolete technology, hardly showing off, I'm sure however that there are plenty of people with an older PC who like a bit of gaming and could benefit from a free upgrade, pardon me for caring.


I just thought that it was funny my hard drive blowing up a week after this thread, I've already stated I've lost almost nothing having regularly backed up useful data.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My original post wasn't to really talk about

> "losing" things, nor was it a chicken-licken

> "everything could go wrong and probably will so

> lets worry worry" post a la Jeremy's suggestion


That wasn't really what I was getting at, more that I consider it highly unlikely that MS/Google/etc could go under, without users having enough notice to get their files back. And besides, who's to say that it's not safer on Google's servers than it is in your home? CDs/DVDs deteriorate, hard drives crash, things get broken or stolen, viruses can render disks useless.


I don't store files online, but I'd have no problem doing so in the future if/when it becomes more convenient than local storage.

Of course they probably won't go under (but hey, the whole banking system nearly did so who knows) but they might change their T&Cs unfavourably


After all google told everyone who had purchased videos from them "tough luck pal, you can't access them anymore" and gave people very short notice


It's that kind of non-ownership that I'm talking about


oh - and sorry to hear about your data Piers

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some foxes are very tame. The foxes that live near the electricity sub-station thing on the corner of Calton and Woodwarde will happily walk up to you/passed you. They are some of the best looking foxes around so clearly being well-fed - glorious coats and bushy tails but interested in humans and keen to engage/be fed rather than being scared.
    • Let’s not all get scared of the foxes now. Most likely explanation is protecting its den or association with food. We have foxes, and cats and they are no bother to each other. The fox will leave when the cats are out.   
    • I remember seeing something a few years ago on TV about a fox that was actually biting through people's shopping / takeaway food bags.  It was situated in an alleyway.  Not in London.  Very interesting in how the  urban foxes brain development has  been affected by their surroundings.   Not an exact quote from Darwin.  It's the adaptable that survive / not the strongest or the most intelligent.   I would be worried if a fox came close me.   Because they might be after my fur babies and they carry a lot of nasties.   Although they look beautiful from a distance or on a 🎄 card.  
    • Driving down Lordship lane around 2.45pm today saw a v sick looking fox walking in and out of the crowd. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...