Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was nearly knocked down today by a white van man hurtling illegally over the Give Way sign at junction between Underhill Road and Dunstan's (he nearly did for a car as well, lots of hooting). He was heading for Barry.


Barry does seem to be a magnet for the badness in ED. Bad Barry. Bad.

"Magnet for badness..."


As a driver I have to say that Barry Road does pose an awful lot of Road Traffic Accident potential hot spots.

It's dead straight, slightly down hill & therefore with excellent visibility straight ahead. Which gives a false impression of safety.

BUT

With numerous side roads, some of them very busy & many of which have compromised vision as you emerge out of them.

This is a busy thoroughfare which demands attention & courteous driving. Both of which can be absent.

& when two equally distracted or speeding road users meet ... the consequences can be fatal.


I have no evidence or speed trap proof, but in my experience 30mph down this road is:

a.Rarely observed.... & if it was.

b.It would still be too fast.


Therefore measures to ensure a lowering of average speeds down this road & steps to ensure better lines of sight as you pull across it, would be both sensible & safer.

Most of the roads in the area around Barry are 20mph limited - Underhill certainly is and that is a bus route (albeit a small bus). Isn't it time that Barry was limited and enforced as 20mph? Or (and/ or) broken up by mini-roundabouts and blocked rights of way so that people can't (despite the temptation) get any speed going - clearly the evidence is that (some) people who use it can't be trusted to drive with the care and consideration a suburban, residential, street demands. Just because buses travel down it doesn't make it a 'main' road.

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ironically the police traffic incident board on

> the corner of Underhill and Barry has created

> another blind spot.


I thought exactly the same when trying to cross Barry Road by car the other day. Does anybody know who we can call to ask for the board to be repositioned? Do you know the number?

As someone who lives on Barry rd I disagree with comment about people knowing there are some blackspots. Local drivers may but as Barry rd runs paralell to LL but with no traffic lights etc it is often used as a cut through for a) people going way over 30 and b) lorries/coaches who want a quick route to a205.


I get why there are no speed bumps as emergency services use it and it's a main bus route but I have often though speed cameras should be installed. Am generally very anti more ways to make driving expensive in London but I think speed people drive down Barry rd is incredibly dangerous and am surprised that it's not site of more frequent accidents.


I was even going to write to council about it but scared of becoming a nosy old biddy as it is without a bit of local campaigning!

I hate speed bumps as I have said before but I think after reading all the posts cameras are the answer .As you live on Barry road you could start by getting some support from the local schools ,maybe getting petitions signed by parents as this area is a busy route for schoolchildren.You wont be thought as nosy but a concerned resident who obviously feels that something needs to be done.
Isn't there a Barry Road Residents Association? I live on Barry Road too and they might be the people to talk to to start a local campaign/contact the council etc. It may be that there is already something in progress. I have no idea how to contact them though - Does anyone know?

The Barry Area Residents Association are aware of the accidents etc in the road. They have forwarded information on to the local councillors and members are looking at all the 'danger spots' .

They are in agreement that the extended pavements restrict clear sightings of the main road.

Two of the BARA members sit on the East Dulwich SN Police Committee and will be taking back people's concerns to Sgt. Jackson.

Ironically, the raised speed table at Goodrich junction had to be lowered as LT buses refused to go up Barry Road as the speed table was too high. Council were forced to lower it which obviously increased the speed which cars could drive down the road. It was public pressure by local people which got the 2 sets of lights at Underhill and Upland Road junction installed in the first instances.


BARA can be contacted either at The East Dulwich Community Centre, Darrell Road. SE 22 9NL

or c/o 274 Barry Road, East Dulwich. SE 22 0JT. Constructive ideas will be welcomed by the committee.

Meetings are on the 2nd Tuesday of the month at 8 pm at East Dulwich Community Centre. Next meeting 8th September.

Next General Meeting 13th October in conjunction with the East Dulwich Society.

Whilst Underhill is a rat-run, and thus may have significant numbers of non-EDers using it, most of the remaining side streets are mainly used by locals - it is Barry which, in particular, has non locals who may be unaware of local conditions,and who are speeding. We may thus assume that people exiting side streets are more likely to be aware of dangers, even though, un-sighted as we often are by parked vehicles etc. we still have to take calculated risks. These would be reduced if, as I and others have suggested on this thread, continental style steel mirrors were erected to overcome blind-spots on intersections, together with more speed warning displays, if other types of speed reducing road furniture are resisted by the mighty bus company.
I think that's a very selfish attitude angetastic. Clearly people are getting injured/killed on a regular basis. And it's time to sort this out once and for all. I understand the argument against speed humps. I always find that those signs indicating your speed, backed up by cameras, are the best way to slow down traffic consistently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yiddish is written in Hebrew script, traditionally, so any attempt to use 'Roman' script will be transliteration, as noted. Hebrew script does not have vowels as such, so any vowels used will try to copy the Yiddish sound of the word. Bagel and Beigel are both correct transliterations of the Yiddish word. 
    • Have they still not fixed it? that's pretty shabby. I took this picture on New Year's Day and it's been like this at least since before Xmas.     
    • To be fair, if I saw you eating any of the parcels I'd have walked out. I noticed last night that the illuminated sign now describes this place as the POT OFFICE. Presumably THC vapes are more profitable than being a drop-off point for bloody Evri
    • Housebuilding isn't that profitable and housebuilders don't have social responsibilities. The affordable housing component is just a tax on new builds. It's a total failure by government - a fantasy belief that the private sector is going to solve the state's social housing crisis for free. It's like expecting Tesco to solve child humgrr by giving away a percentage of its products. It's not gonna work - it just slows down and disincentivises private sector construction of new housing. The only solution to the housing crisis is a massive increase in the supply of housing, not a couple of "affordable" flats in a new development. The state needs to solve the problem of NIMBYs (one of whom is prominent on this thread), get out of the way of private sector developers building private rentals and homes for sale, and borrow to build a huge amount of social housing.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...