Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was nearly knocked down today by a white van man hurtling illegally over the Give Way sign at junction between Underhill Road and Dunstan's (he nearly did for a car as well, lots of hooting). He was heading for Barry.


Barry does seem to be a magnet for the badness in ED. Bad Barry. Bad.

"Magnet for badness..."


As a driver I have to say that Barry Road does pose an awful lot of Road Traffic Accident potential hot spots.

It's dead straight, slightly down hill & therefore with excellent visibility straight ahead. Which gives a false impression of safety.

BUT

With numerous side roads, some of them very busy & many of which have compromised vision as you emerge out of them.

This is a busy thoroughfare which demands attention & courteous driving. Both of which can be absent.

& when two equally distracted or speeding road users meet ... the consequences can be fatal.


I have no evidence or speed trap proof, but in my experience 30mph down this road is:

a.Rarely observed.... & if it was.

b.It would still be too fast.


Therefore measures to ensure a lowering of average speeds down this road & steps to ensure better lines of sight as you pull across it, would be both sensible & safer.

Most of the roads in the area around Barry are 20mph limited - Underhill certainly is and that is a bus route (albeit a small bus). Isn't it time that Barry was limited and enforced as 20mph? Or (and/ or) broken up by mini-roundabouts and blocked rights of way so that people can't (despite the temptation) get any speed going - clearly the evidence is that (some) people who use it can't be trusted to drive with the care and consideration a suburban, residential, street demands. Just because buses travel down it doesn't make it a 'main' road.

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ironically the police traffic incident board on

> the corner of Underhill and Barry has created

> another blind spot.


I thought exactly the same when trying to cross Barry Road by car the other day. Does anybody know who we can call to ask for the board to be repositioned? Do you know the number?

As someone who lives on Barry rd I disagree with comment about people knowing there are some blackspots. Local drivers may but as Barry rd runs paralell to LL but with no traffic lights etc it is often used as a cut through for a) people going way over 30 and b) lorries/coaches who want a quick route to a205.


I get why there are no speed bumps as emergency services use it and it's a main bus route but I have often though speed cameras should be installed. Am generally very anti more ways to make driving expensive in London but I think speed people drive down Barry rd is incredibly dangerous and am surprised that it's not site of more frequent accidents.


I was even going to write to council about it but scared of becoming a nosy old biddy as it is without a bit of local campaigning!

I hate speed bumps as I have said before but I think after reading all the posts cameras are the answer .As you live on Barry road you could start by getting some support from the local schools ,maybe getting petitions signed by parents as this area is a busy route for schoolchildren.You wont be thought as nosy but a concerned resident who obviously feels that something needs to be done.
Isn't there a Barry Road Residents Association? I live on Barry Road too and they might be the people to talk to to start a local campaign/contact the council etc. It may be that there is already something in progress. I have no idea how to contact them though - Does anyone know?

The Barry Area Residents Association are aware of the accidents etc in the road. They have forwarded information on to the local councillors and members are looking at all the 'danger spots' .

They are in agreement that the extended pavements restrict clear sightings of the main road.

Two of the BARA members sit on the East Dulwich SN Police Committee and will be taking back people's concerns to Sgt. Jackson.

Ironically, the raised speed table at Goodrich junction had to be lowered as LT buses refused to go up Barry Road as the speed table was too high. Council were forced to lower it which obviously increased the speed which cars could drive down the road. It was public pressure by local people which got the 2 sets of lights at Underhill and Upland Road junction installed in the first instances.


BARA can be contacted either at The East Dulwich Community Centre, Darrell Road. SE 22 9NL

or c/o 274 Barry Road, East Dulwich. SE 22 0JT. Constructive ideas will be welcomed by the committee.

Meetings are on the 2nd Tuesday of the month at 8 pm at East Dulwich Community Centre. Next meeting 8th September.

Next General Meeting 13th October in conjunction with the East Dulwich Society.

Whilst Underhill is a rat-run, and thus may have significant numbers of non-EDers using it, most of the remaining side streets are mainly used by locals - it is Barry which, in particular, has non locals who may be unaware of local conditions,and who are speeding. We may thus assume that people exiting side streets are more likely to be aware of dangers, even though, un-sighted as we often are by parked vehicles etc. we still have to take calculated risks. These would be reduced if, as I and others have suggested on this thread, continental style steel mirrors were erected to overcome blind-spots on intersections, together with more speed warning displays, if other types of speed reducing road furniture are resisted by the mighty bus company.
I think that's a very selfish attitude angetastic. Clearly people are getting injured/killed on a regular basis. And it's time to sort this out once and for all. I understand the argument against speed humps. I always find that those signs indicating your speed, backed up by cameras, are the best way to slow down traffic consistently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...