Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello


I am sad to report we had a burglary on Barry road today


It occured somewhere in the middle between Silvester Road and Goodrich Road


Looks like they targeted the two buildings that had the least effective protection between detachments


Most buildings have a wooden, door-like structure, between neighbouring structures, this one doesn't


They must have been chancers looking for the weakest spot on Barry Road to get in and out quickly.


They must also have had a vehicle, probably a van, waiting outside the property. They no doubt were casing the property and the home owner's behaviour for a while, in order to know when to strike.


If you see a Van you or your neighbour isn't expecting one then be cautious and take the number


They took the stolen property onto Barry Road and drove off


So be wary of "removal men"


BR

insecurities are what they will look for, but its amazing the number of scenes i am called to where the laxness of the residents just makes it that bit easier for thieves to get in, and i hate to say it but its the obvious ones like not closing and locking windows and doors, but the even more unforgivable sin of locking the door and leaving the key in the lock, to be honest you,d be better off leaving the door unlocked in the first place, at least then you don,t have to replace a broken window as well. it sounds obvious and patronising, but if you lock it remove the key and put it somewhere out of sight and unaccessable, its a simple measure, but in my experience it can be sufficient to put off a potential thief and make them move on to somewhere more easier, as most burgularies are not planned, but oppotunistic breaks.

Sorry, did you suggest taking the key out of the door and into the house with you? Did you reallY?

And that a key in the door MIGHT be an invitation to enter the house because in your experience thieves are less likely to target the house WITHOUT the key in the door?

JetSetWilly...... seriously?


Are there people out there who KNOWINGLY leave the key in the door?

Internets, who'd have 'em?


Honestly, if you're gonna start anally picking people's posts apart who are just offering help, then you should at least make the effort to read them properly. The bit about having to break the window to get at the key clearly indicates he meant leaving the key in the inside of the door.

Okay, call me stupid all you want be he suggested to not make yourself an obvious target. If the key is on the inside, how is that obvious? Once they have smashed the window to get at the key, aren't they already in your house?


I owe JetSetWilly an apology because the he is obviously a locksmith and knows wayyyyy more about locks and keys than I do,

but I am still a bit stumped. Clearly I am not from around here. :)

No worries Helena I didn't work it out either, I was scratching my head when I read it. All makes sense now.


But then I've never left a key in the lock unless I was really drunk, and then it would be on the outside, and the door would be swinging in the breeze.


I should say that I've done that overnight a number of times on Crawthew Grove, and we never had any unwanted visitors.

helena handbasket Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay, call me stupid all you want be he suggested

> to not make yourself an obvious target. If the

> key is on the inside, how is that obvious? Once

> they have smashed the window to get at the key,

> aren't they already in your house?

>

> I owe JetSetWilly an apology because the he is

> obviously a locksmith and knows wayyyyy more about

> locks and keys than I do,

> but I am still a bit stumped. Clearly I am not

> from around here. :)



i,m actually a soco(csi), and while i,m not a locksmith i do through my role know a fair bit about locks and keys. however i do know a lot more about how entry is gained to peoples homes and generally it is through lax security even when the person is in the house, eg front window left open, purse,keys,games console in view, homeowner nips into the kitchen to pop on the kettle, thief walks past and bang the property is gone, sounds incredulous but it happens and its very common. as is leaving keys in locked doors, occasionally front doors but generally back/side doors, a thief will always look for an easy access point and will look through windows to find them, and also make sure as much as possible the place is empty, but if there is a key in a door or window, they will smash it to gain access to the key,reach through and open the door, its very rare that a thief will climb through a smashed window, very easy to get cut and leave blood and consequently a dna hit.

as i mentioned before most burglaries are opportunistic and again i dont want to sound partonising but simple measures such as locking windows and doors(even when in the house, removing keys from doors and placing them out of site ,not leaving valuables lying around in view, will be sufficent to prevent most people from becoming the next victim. police safer summer campaigns advocate such behaviour, why because it works.

In this case the entrance to the garden (and then the flat, which had its windows locked) was gained through a side alley. There was a padlock on the gate but the gate was not easily visible from the street and this relative privacy made it easy to force it open (during the day). Easier than when the gate blocks the alley off at the front of the house.


Basically: check your gates and watch out for people parking their cars in front of your flat and behaving strangely (don't ask me for a definition of strange behaviour :-S)

  • Administrator

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think the thread should read 5th August not 5th

> Sept unless we are predicting when we are all

> going to get done! >:D<


Well spotted, I have changed the title

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...