Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Of course it's annoying, but the decision should be looked at in context given that charging for this service now seems to be standard across London and beyond.

Sutton, the only London borough controlled by Cllr Barber's party, charges ?25 for 3 items, then ?5 for any item beyond that - so ?60 for 10 items rather than ?16.

At the higher end, Barnet charges ?56.60 for one item, Richmond ?50 for five...

Hi dc,

I'm a Southwark councillor.

When my lot led the council officers repeatedly told us to charge for this service but we didn't because we didn't want an increase in fly tipping.


Since then even more compelling evidence about the broken window theory and crime generation.

I have just had a running battle with the bulk waste team who refused on 3 occasions to pick up a tv stand and its front cover which had come unstuck. Despite my complaining several times to the call centre staff and writing emails to senior staff and councillors, the team decided the cover was glass and refused to pick the items up with no explanation. I was told that they are supposed to put a calling card through the front door with information on it but this didn't happen and the last time I waited in to see the team so I'm afraid I'm convinced they didn't turn up at all. I have made all issues known and each time, call centre staff seemed ill equipped to deal with simple enquiries and hadn't read any of the emails so it was a frustrating experience having to repeat it all again each time. The first time no note was made of my call. My concerns about call centre staff being ill equipped deal with the onslaught of customer complaints once the charge is imposed and, additionally, complaints about the inevitable increase in fly tipping were ignored on every occasion. In the end, as I had injured my wrist, I paid my neighbour to drive it to the recycling centre where it was received with no problem but not everyone would be prepared to do this and the item would possibly just have been dumped elsewhere.

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I arranged for 8 fence panels to be arranged this

> Tuesday and needless to say the council guys...


Hi Rockets,

This is the response I've had:

"

Thank you for your enquiry concerning the bulk waste collection service experienced by a Southwark resident which has been passed to me to investigate, I can respond as follows.


The service requested was for collection of 8 fence panels with attached fence posts and 4 bags. The bulky waste collection crew went to carry out this job on 29th September. They found that the fence panels could not be safely removed as they were breaking up in hand as soon as any attempt was made to lift them, and also some of the fence panels were overgrown with trailing vegetation making them more difficult to safely handle. The collection crew took such items as they were safely able to and left the remainder. The collection team do use calling cards to advise residents if they are not able to do a collection but they did not do so for this collection as some items were removed.


Based on the information available it was not unreasonable for the collection crew to have left some items because they were not safe to collect. Nevertheless, there are a number of aspects raised by this enquiry that can help us to improve the provision of the bulky waste service in future, these are:


? At the point when the service is booked it needs to be made clear that items must be presented for collection such that they will not fall apart when picked up and carried, are free of trailing vegetation, cables or other trip hazards, and where appropriate are bagged, boxed or tied, all to enable safe collection.

? Calling cards are to be left by the collection crew for any job that is only partially completed as well for any jobs that are not completed.

? The database records for the collection that are shared by Veolia and the Call Centre are updated accurately to identify reasons for partial or non-collection.


I hope this response deals satisfactorily with your enquiry. Please let me know if you have any further queries.

"

Their response is utter poppycock - whatever next we couldn't touch wood as we might get splinters....?


I can very much assure you they were not breaking up in hand as I moved them from the garden to the front of the house and they are very much intact....


And the trailing vegetation is laughable....photo attached of the killer vegetation....


James, thank you for following-up - could you send to me the contact details of the person who responded as I would like to speak to them?


It appears there is a problem with the bulk collection team and I wonder whether anyone within the council is prepared to address the issues? Today I called their customer service line and spoke to a very helpful person who once again said they are having lots of problems with the team responsible for collections and a mass of complaints.


It looks to me that there are problems and yet those responsible for the collections are turning a blind eye to it....

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> And the trailing vegetation is laughable....photo

> attached of the killer vegetation....

>



I think to be fair, that's a potential trip hazard.


Lengths of mature Ivy can be quite sturdy, and if somebody caught their foot in one it probably wouldn't just break.

Sue, there is nothing attached to the fence that is dangling that anyone might be able to trip on or to hang themselves on! Granted they do have to negotiate a front gate that will swing shut in a brisk wind....perhaps they need to do a risk assessment....;-)


Quite simply they are being bone-idle and not doing the job they are paid to do and many other people are having the same issue with these teams. Ultimately, it is wasting tax-payers money. I now have my third collection attempt booked (they were a no show on the second and the telephone helpline people say that you just need to keep booking slots and they will pick it up eventually).


As I said earlier perhaps they won't want to pick it up for fear of getting splinters....there is definitely a potential splinter hazard....

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, there is nothing attached to the fence that

> is dangling that anyone might be able to trip on

> or to hang themselves on!



I meant when they are carrying it.


It looks from your photo as if there is ivy attached (and lying on the ground beneath the fence) which would hang down if the fence was lifted?


Apologies if I'm wrong.

So, the collection was re-arranged for yesterday and guess what....nothing removed - what a surprise. And, no calling card left either....so looks like the council are still not following their own code....or perhaps no-one bothered to come out...what a shambolic council we have to endure...I will call them tomorrow for their latest round of excuses....


Anyone got the contact details for Deborah Collins at Southwark as I understand she is the one responsible for this "service" within the council....?

My last 3 complaints regarding bins/large item collection/food bags have been either channelled through or copied to Deborah Collins who has never responded. It seems that, increasingly, senior staff are more detached from their individual areas of responsibility and just don't get involved. As outlined in a previous post my recent experience with a large item collection was terrible and ended up with the team coming out again even though I had notified senior staff that I had, to end the saga, paid a neighbour to take the item to the recycling centre. The total cost, involving many staff and councillors must have amounted to a sizeable sum and demonstrated the incompetence of the team and the lack of management they receive. They will not, it appears, be able to deal with the higher level of expectations from customers when the charge is imposed or the the increase in complaints with the anticipated fly tipping. Poor value for council tax payers.

Is the service outsourced? Maybe we can get more joy making noise with the company responsible for it. Companies with a commercial interest tend to care more about reputation than unaccountable council officials.


Anyone who has had problems please feel free to PM me with details of the issues and we can collate a list of problems.


Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...