Jump to content

Southwark large item collection


Callie

Recommended Posts

Of course it's annoying, but the decision should be looked at in context given that charging for this service now seems to be standard across London and beyond.

Sutton, the only London borough controlled by Cllr Barber's party, charges ?25 for 3 items, then ?5 for any item beyond that - so ?60 for 10 items rather than ?16.

At the higher end, Barnet charges ?56.60 for one item, Richmond ?50 for five...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just had a running battle with the bulk waste team who refused on 3 occasions to pick up a tv stand and its front cover which had come unstuck. Despite my complaining several times to the call centre staff and writing emails to senior staff and councillors, the team decided the cover was glass and refused to pick the items up with no explanation. I was told that they are supposed to put a calling card through the front door with information on it but this didn't happen and the last time I waited in to see the team so I'm afraid I'm convinced they didn't turn up at all. I have made all issues known and each time, call centre staff seemed ill equipped to deal with simple enquiries and hadn't read any of the emails so it was a frustrating experience having to repeat it all again each time. The first time no note was made of my call. My concerns about call centre staff being ill equipped deal with the onslaught of customer complaints once the charge is imposed and, additionally, complaints about the inevitable increase in fly tipping were ignored on every occasion. In the end, as I had injured my wrist, I paid my neighbour to drive it to the recycling centre where it was received with no problem but not everyone would be prepared to do this and the item would possibly just have been dumped elsewhere.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I arranged for 8 fence panels to be arranged this

> Tuesday and needless to say the council guys...


Hi Rockets,

This is the response I've had:

"

Thank you for your enquiry concerning the bulk waste collection service experienced by a Southwark resident which has been passed to me to investigate, I can respond as follows.


The service requested was for collection of 8 fence panels with attached fence posts and 4 bags. The bulky waste collection crew went to carry out this job on 29th September. They found that the fence panels could not be safely removed as they were breaking up in hand as soon as any attempt was made to lift them, and also some of the fence panels were overgrown with trailing vegetation making them more difficult to safely handle. The collection crew took such items as they were safely able to and left the remainder. The collection team do use calling cards to advise residents if they are not able to do a collection but they did not do so for this collection as some items were removed.


Based on the information available it was not unreasonable for the collection crew to have left some items because they were not safe to collect. Nevertheless, there are a number of aspects raised by this enquiry that can help us to improve the provision of the bulky waste service in future, these are:


? At the point when the service is booked it needs to be made clear that items must be presented for collection such that they will not fall apart when picked up and carried, are free of trailing vegetation, cables or other trip hazards, and where appropriate are bagged, boxed or tied, all to enable safe collection.

? Calling cards are to be left by the collection crew for any job that is only partially completed as well for any jobs that are not completed.

? The database records for the collection that are shared by Veolia and the Call Centre are updated accurately to identify reasons for partial or non-collection.


I hope this response deals satisfactorily with your enquiry. Please let me know if you have any further queries.

"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their response is utter poppycock - whatever next we couldn't touch wood as we might get splinters....?


I can very much assure you they were not breaking up in hand as I moved them from the garden to the front of the house and they are very much intact....


And the trailing vegetation is laughable....photo attached of the killer vegetation....


James, thank you for following-up - could you send to me the contact details of the person who responded as I would like to speak to them?


It appears there is a problem with the bulk collection team and I wonder whether anyone within the council is prepared to address the issues? Today I called their customer service line and spoke to a very helpful person who once again said they are having lots of problems with the team responsible for collections and a mass of complaints.


It looks to me that there are problems and yet those responsible for the collections are turning a blind eye to it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> And the trailing vegetation is laughable....photo

> attached of the killer vegetation....

>



I think to be fair, that's a potential trip hazard.


Lengths of mature Ivy can be quite sturdy, and if somebody caught their foot in one it probably wouldn't just break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue, there is nothing attached to the fence that is dangling that anyone might be able to trip on or to hang themselves on! Granted they do have to negotiate a front gate that will swing shut in a brisk wind....perhaps they need to do a risk assessment....;-)


Quite simply they are being bone-idle and not doing the job they are paid to do and many other people are having the same issue with these teams. Ultimately, it is wasting tax-payers money. I now have my third collection attempt booked (they were a no show on the second and the telephone helpline people say that you just need to keep booking slots and they will pick it up eventually).


As I said earlier perhaps they won't want to pick it up for fear of getting splinters....there is definitely a potential splinter hazard....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is still no charge at the moment Azalea.


Thank you. Have you heard anything about an upcoming charge, as James Barber said it would start in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, there is nothing attached to the fence that

> is dangling that anyone might be able to trip on

> or to hang themselves on!



I meant when they are carrying it.


It looks from your photo as if there is ivy attached (and lying on the ground beneath the fence) which would hang down if the fence was lifted?


Apologies if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the collection was re-arranged for yesterday and guess what....nothing removed - what a surprise. And, no calling card left either....so looks like the council are still not following their own code....or perhaps no-one bothered to come out...what a shambolic council we have to endure...I will call them tomorrow for their latest round of excuses....


Anyone got the contact details for Deborah Collins at Southwark as I understand she is the one responsible for this "service" within the council....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last 3 complaints regarding bins/large item collection/food bags have been either channelled through or copied to Deborah Collins who has never responded. It seems that, increasingly, senior staff are more detached from their individual areas of responsibility and just don't get involved. As outlined in a previous post my recent experience with a large item collection was terrible and ended up with the team coming out again even though I had notified senior staff that I had, to end the saga, paid a neighbour to take the item to the recycling centre. The total cost, involving many staff and councillors must have amounted to a sizeable sum and demonstrated the incompetence of the team and the lack of management they receive. They will not, it appears, be able to deal with the higher level of expectations from customers when the charge is imposed or the the increase in complaints with the anticipated fly tipping. Poor value for council tax payers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the service outsourced? Maybe we can get more joy making noise with the company responsible for it. Companies with a commercial interest tend to care more about reputation than unaccountable council officials.


Anyone who has had problems please feel free to PM me with details of the issues and we can collate a list of problems.


Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...