Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> BELOW IS REPLY FROM FOXTONS...will update the

> Forum when I receive a fuller reply.

>

> "Thank you for your email, we are looking into

> this matter and I will update you further next

> week.

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Rosie Nagle"



Sorry - have just realised it's the same standard email the rest of you have received. It will be interesting to see if the next lot of replies are different (given that some of our emails will have differed).

sophiesofa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't get it and probably never will unless someone explains.


My interpretation is that Honaloochie said "Wat Graham26 sed"... people thought this was a pun, because a watt is a unit of power (but not a "wat", I don't know what that is).


Actually a whole load of electricity related puns just popped into my head, but I'll spare you for now...

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > > Absolutely brilliant. Low energy or not,

> its

> > > still

> > > > energy- WATSED.

> > > >

> > > > Foxtons are the worst of a rather awful

> > bunch.

> > >

> > > Wat Graham26 sed.

> >

> >

> > I get it HB!!! I get it. :)

>

>

> ME TOO!! ME TOO!! (It took me a while though!:)))


----------------------------------------------------------


Oh BLAST i've watsed TOO much time on this to work it out




W**F

You know what you are doing? You are giving them the chance to come up smelling of roses. If this PR woman had any savyy (and being in her particular job, I bet she's pretty good) she'll spin it, roll it out, get some media coverage and noone in the wider world will be wiser that it all started off as a complaint against it on the EDF. It'll look like a major initiative to help the environment. Bravo!
funny you should say that - I had a reporter contact me from the South London Press about wanting to do a story on this...so as you say Nero - from small acorns and all that - it will be interesting to see comes of this. Lets wait and see what happens next week...

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You know what you are doing? You are giving them

> the chance to come up smelling of roses. If this

> PR woman had any savyy (and being in her

> particular job, I bet she's pretty good) she'll

> spin it, roll it out, get some media coverage and

> noone in the wider world will be wiser that it all

> started off as a complaint against it on the EDF.

> It'll look like a major initiative to help the

> environment. Bravo!



If it means that they turn off the lights and the tvs then does it matter? It'll take a lot more that a PR offensive about correcting poor environmental behaviour for Foxtons to come up smelling of roses.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sophiesofa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't get it and probably never will unless

> someone explains.

>

> My interpretation is that Honaloochie said "Wat

> Graham26 sed"... people thought this was a pun,

> because a watt is a unit of power (but not a

> "wat", I don't know what that is).

>

> Actually a whole load of electricity related puns

> just popped into my head, but I'll spare you for

> now...


Ohm I God, Jez and SophieS. Wire you not getting this?

Fuse two don't power yourselves a stiff drink and go back over the thread and figure it out, I might take to my bed faraday.

WoofMarkThe Dog, please contact SophieSofa, arrange to meter and explain, if you'd be so kind. Don't be terse though, it's not her volt.

I'll take Jeremy aside and explain watts watt.

lemonellen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> If it means that they turn off the lights and the

> tvs then does it matter? It'll take a lot more

> that a PR offensive about correcting poor

> environmental behaviour for Foxtons to come up

> smelling of roses.



My sentiments exactly lemonellen.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > sophiesofa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I don't get it and probably never will unless

> > someone explains.

> >

> > My interpretation is that Honaloochie said "Wat

> > Graham26 sed"... people thought this was a pun,

> > because a watt is a unit of power (but not a

> > "wat", I don't know what that is).

> >

> > Actually a whole load of electricity related

> puns

> > just popped into my head, but I'll spare you

> for

> > now...

>

> Ohm I God, Jez and SophieS. Wire you not getting

> this?

> Fuse two don't power yourselves a stiff drink and

> go back over the thread and figure it out, I might

> take to my bed faraday.

> WoofMarkThe Dog, please contact SophieSofa,

> arrange to meter and explain, if you'd be so kind.

> Don't be terse though, it's not her volt.

> I'll take Jeremy aside and explain watts watt.



Love it!

sophiesofa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Watt?

-------------------------------


Sophiesettee


Yoar spelling is appalling.


A clue.


The TOO & BLAST are read herrings & eye put them in two put you in a pspin, it has werked.


I'm shocked buy how static this is getting as I have watsed two much tymne & take that as a jolt. Stay at ohm twoday till youf worked it out.




W**F



*Like that whale in free willy yeah well I'ts all there in black & white . I'm off down the beach now , when I'm back I'll let you off the hook as it whirr*

Look - lets just drop this - Foxtons are a bunch of watsers and don't deserve the attention.



woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No because it's a good thread

>

>

> "Betting " lets drop that ?

>

>

> Back to your stable ......"neigh"

>

>

> W**F



Didn't you get my watsers joke Woof? The whole thread has derived from wat HB sed earlier.

computedshorty - She'd only be wasting energy if she put more water in the kettle than she actually needed for her cuppa. In fact, the use of a flask could be considered the bigger waste of energy as that flask had to be made....AND the water boiled.


Good news that the lights are off....were they all off or just the office lights, with the signs left on?

Danstable Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good news that the lights are off....were they all

> off or just the office lights, with the signs left

> on?


ALL lights were off - apart from the fridge light at the front. We need to keep an eye out to see whether this was a one-off accident or something more permanent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...