Jump to content

Foxtons: Turn the lights out!


Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> BELOW IS REPLY FROM FOXTONS...will update the

> Forum when I receive a fuller reply.

>

> "Thank you for your email, we are looking into

> this matter and I will update you further next

> week.

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Rosie Nagle"



Sorry - have just realised it's the same standard email the rest of you have received. It will be interesting to see if the next lot of replies are different (given that some of our emails will have differed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sophiesofa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't get it and probably never will unless someone explains.


My interpretation is that Honaloochie said "Wat Graham26 sed"... people thought this was a pun, because a watt is a unit of power (but not a "wat", I don't know what that is).


Actually a whole load of electricity related puns just popped into my head, but I'll spare you for now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > > Absolutely brilliant. Low energy or not,

> its

> > > still

> > > > energy- WATSED.

> > > >

> > > > Foxtons are the worst of a rather awful

> > bunch.

> > >

> > > Wat Graham26 sed.

> >

> >

> > I get it HB!!! I get it. :)

>

>

> ME TOO!! ME TOO!! (It took me a while though!:)))


----------------------------------------------------------


Oh BLAST i've watsed TOO much time on this to work it out




W**F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what you are doing? You are giving them the chance to come up smelling of roses. If this PR woman had any savyy (and being in her particular job, I bet she's pretty good) she'll spin it, roll it out, get some media coverage and noone in the wider world will be wiser that it all started off as a complaint against it on the EDF. It'll look like a major initiative to help the environment. Bravo!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

funny you should say that - I had a reporter contact me from the South London Press about wanting to do a story on this...so as you say Nero - from small acorns and all that - it will be interesting to see comes of this. Lets wait and see what happens next week...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You know what you are doing? You are giving them

> the chance to come up smelling of roses. If this

> PR woman had any savyy (and being in her

> particular job, I bet she's pretty good) she'll

> spin it, roll it out, get some media coverage and

> noone in the wider world will be wiser that it all

> started off as a complaint against it on the EDF.

> It'll look like a major initiative to help the

> environment. Bravo!



If it means that they turn off the lights and the tvs then does it matter? It'll take a lot more that a PR offensive about correcting poor environmental behaviour for Foxtons to come up smelling of roses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sophiesofa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't get it and probably never will unless

> someone explains.

>

> My interpretation is that Honaloochie said "Wat

> Graham26 sed"... people thought this was a pun,

> because a watt is a unit of power (but not a

> "wat", I don't know what that is).

>

> Actually a whole load of electricity related puns

> just popped into my head, but I'll spare you for

> now...


Ohm I God, Jez and SophieS. Wire you not getting this?

Fuse two don't power yourselves a stiff drink and go back over the thread and figure it out, I might take to my bed faraday.

WoofMarkThe Dog, please contact SophieSofa, arrange to meter and explain, if you'd be so kind. Don't be terse though, it's not her volt.

I'll take Jeremy aside and explain watts watt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lemonellen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> If it means that they turn off the lights and the

> tvs then does it matter? It'll take a lot more

> that a PR offensive about correcting poor

> environmental behaviour for Foxtons to come up

> smelling of roses.



My sentiments exactly lemonellen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > sophiesofa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I don't get it and probably never will unless

> > someone explains.

> >

> > My interpretation is that Honaloochie said "Wat

> > Graham26 sed"... people thought this was a pun,

> > because a watt is a unit of power (but not a

> > "wat", I don't know what that is).

> >

> > Actually a whole load of electricity related

> puns

> > just popped into my head, but I'll spare you

> for

> > now...

>

> Ohm I God, Jez and SophieS. Wire you not getting

> this?

> Fuse two don't power yourselves a stiff drink and

> go back over the thread and figure it out, I might

> take to my bed faraday.

> WoofMarkThe Dog, please contact SophieSofa,

> arrange to meter and explain, if you'd be so kind.

> Don't be terse though, it's not her volt.

> I'll take Jeremy aside and explain watts watt.



Love it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sophiesofa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Watt?

-------------------------------


Sophiesettee


Yoar spelling is appalling.


A clue.


The TOO & BLAST are read herrings & eye put them in two put you in a pspin, it has werked.


I'm shocked buy how static this is getting as I have watsed two much tymne & take that as a jolt. Stay at ohm twoday till youf worked it out.




W**F



*Like that whale in free willy yeah well I'ts all there in black & white . I'm off down the beach now , when I'm back I'll let you off the hook as it whirr*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look - lets just drop this - Foxtons are a bunch of watsers and don't deserve the attention.



woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No because it's a good thread

>

>

> "Betting " lets drop that ?

>

>

> Back to your stable ......"neigh"

>

>

> W**F



Didn't you get my watsers joke Woof? The whole thread has derived from wat HB sed earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought I'd tell you that yesterday the lights were off in Foxtons at night. Also the TVs were on, but not displaying a picture - however still burning electricity. The only light on was the fridge. Has anyone else noticed this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

computedshorty - She'd only be wasting energy if she put more water in the kettle than she actually needed for her cuppa. In fact, the use of a flask could be considered the bigger waste of energy as that flask had to be made....AND the water boiled.


Good news that the lights are off....were they all off or just the office lights, with the signs left on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danstable Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good news that the lights are off....were they all

> off or just the office lights, with the signs left

> on?


ALL lights were off - apart from the fridge light at the front. We need to keep an eye out to see whether this was a one-off accident or something more permanent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Member  4.7k Posted Sunday at 22: Member  4.7k Posted Sunday at 22:35 Can someone please explain who "Clean Air Dulwich" are?  Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • FredMarsh, I sympathise with you. I suspect the coral fencing at the entrance is to prevent people legging it out of store with unpaid for goods in hand. It does feel a bit like herding cattle as you describe it. Perhaps the reduction in customers is a response to this and the lack of previously available services.  I find self check out is quicker if I do it myself and since the new self service points have been installed the screens work much better as they are as of today still newish. The old ones were "knackered" and continued to regularly fail.  I had to buy some whisky as a present for someone yesterday, the Sainsbury staff took it away, removed the security tags and returned it, so that all went simply.  Unfortunately the days of what was the original Sainsburys in Peckham and Forest Hill are long gone, as are many of the old shops I remember from the mid 70's, i.e. Kennedy's. The world continually changes and as we get older we have to keep up.  I saw something really sad in Peckham yesterday, a very, very old woman walking down Hanover Park by Primark on the corner with Rye Lane, bent almost half over, pushing her own four wheel trolley along, taking her time.  Made me  realise how lucky I am.   Yes, checking the receipt to make sure Nectar has been applied is always worth doing. Ditto Tesco Old Kent Road this week were what the label of the stack of fruit said one price and even with the Tesco card, the price at checkout was different, that resulted in photo's and it still being checked by Customer Service...... As for "Sainsburys always being horrible", I have to disagree with you on that. 
    • One Dulwich   Campaign Update | 3 May Parliament debates LTNs – please fill in the questionnaire by 6 May Parliament will debate two petitions – “Carry out an independent review into Low Traffic Neighbourhoods” and “Exempt Blue Badge drivers from Low Traffic Neighbourhoods” – at 4.30 pm on Monday 20 May in the Grand Committee Room above Westminster Hall. Please fill in this short questionnaire about your experience of the Dulwich LTNs, as your comments will help to inform the debate. The deadline for this is very soon – 10am on Monday 6 May. We have written to our MP Helen Hayes, pointing out that her constituents represent the second highest number of those who requested both petitions, and asking her to take part in the debate in order to represent the two-thirds majority of people living and working in Dulwich who asked for the Dulwich LTNs to be reconsidered. Because these petitions are directed at Parliament, not Southwark Council, we hope that Helen Hayes will speak up for her constituents on this occasion. You might want to encourage her to take part by emailing her at [email protected]. We have also reminded her that a group of Blue Badge holders have petitioned the Leader of Southwark Council to be allowed through the Dulwich Village junction because of the daily difficulties, distress and – in some cases – severe pain suffered by disabled and other vulnerable car-dependent constituents who are now forced to take long and circuitous detours in stop-start traffic along boundary roads. You can watch the debate – and, we hope, our MP representing our interests – on Parliament tv, or you can attend in person. Thank you for your support. The One Dulwich Team  SUPPORT ONE DULWICH 
    • Yeah, that’s not my point. I explained that the locale is in unpleasant and uncared for, not the businesses (which I called “valiant” so you could deduce I was not against them at all but maybe you didn’t see that.  I think they need support from the council in the shape of a sprucing up). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...