Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And now you've reverted to some sort of deviant sexual hierarchy as a measure of your self-coronation HAL9000?


Intriguing.


Is that how you see sex HAL9000, sort of sticking your privates in something as a subjugation? Do you do it to women? Do you teach them a lesson? Do you make them learn?


Like an incontinent schoolboy you're running around the playground braying about a fictional victory, not because you actually won anything, but because you've pooed in your panties and you're embarrassed. Every hop you get that skidding feeling in your cheeks. If only it would go away. In the end you can't sort it out can you, because you can't bear what you've done. You can't accept you've messed yourself.


I thought for some reason that you were in your forties HAL9000, can't remember why. However, there is something almost tragically autistic in your postings, and I apologise unreservedly if you do have this unfortunate disorder.


Still aiming for the last word chap? ;-) Off you go...

Alright boys, that's enough now. Just stop it. Both of you.


I have no idea what the rights and wrongs of your discussion were (and I have no inclination to read it) but the childish, tedious and at times extremely distastful exchange of insults since you arrived in the lounge is making you both look like fools.


Apologies for the mum voice, but it needed to be said.

Every time I have tried to end this thread in a friendly and amicable way - I've lost count how many attempts I've made - you always bounce back with an ever more bizarre escalation.


I've come to the conclusion that your obsessive behaviour is theraputic at some level so I'm content to humour you until whatever demons are plaguing you are exhausted.

Quite right Lulu, to be honest appearances can be deceiving. There's gales of laughter chez Huguenot, and it's already cost me a fiver with another forumite, because I thought HAL9000 would give up earlier.


In fact I do respect HAL9000's point, I just think that in this issue as with others the fears are overplayed, heightening anxieties to the detriment of our general well being.


I'll stop now regardless of whatever final insults are tossed my way ;-) HAL9000 would probably prefer to have the final say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...