Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone else see these requests and calls for assistance and think 'what the f_ck' such as;


"What's the quickest way to run a bath?"


"How do I do up my shoe laces?"


"How do you go about making icecubes?"


O.K, I know that the above are a bit of an exageration but a lot of the requests for info or way of going about doing something on the forum (not just this one) could easily be solved by a bit of Google research or in a book instead of posting on an internet message board.


Call me old fashioned or cynical but sometimes these requests only require a tiny bit of effort on behalf of the poster.


Lecture over.

Very funny BBW - it did make me laugh


I think a lot of ppl who ain't got a clue feel more comfortable asking such questions to similarly blessed individuals.. although many people on the EDF are of course intellectual super stars it still represents a cross section of society so is thus a better way of asking dimwit questions than say on the pompous Bathroom Forum..


Having done a quick check on Google for "What's the quickest way to run a bath?" (btw, I *think* I know the answer doh) you'll find out on page 1 it does not really cater for the mentally challenged hence why these kind of mind boggling threads exist..

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wazup?

>

> Don't come across as a w_nker Hal.

>

> Please, never use that bastardization of 'what's

> up' ever again or I'll set Louisiana on you.

>

> This is Britain, not America.


Attack dog ready and waiting BBW B)


leash, strain

Fair point bbw.

Alas some of the the posts on here are just a small microcosm of the general idleness of people off the scope of the ED forum.

I feel far more depressed at some examples of 999 calls that are made.


A male caller has dialled 999 to report that he has not been paid by the DSS.

A female caller has dialled 999 to ask what year the Internet started.

A male caller has dialled 999 to say that his wife has gone out without leaving any food to eat.

Another caller wanted to know the weather while one woman said her hamster was trapped behind a wardrobe.


Could these also be people 'touched in the head'?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...