Jump to content

Recommended Posts

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lol oh come on Mick mac everyone has had a bit of

> girl on girl in their time, slightly blase about

> it now, been there bought the carpet and munched

> on it.>:D<


Oh Jesus, I just KNOW I'm going to regret this...but...by: "a bit of girl on girl in their time, slightly blase about

it now, been there bought the carpet and munched on it..." do you mean what I THINK you mean? ::o

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Darling legal-eagle-ish

> Not necessarily true about sex not that great in a

> loving relationship. I have been married 11 years

> this August and we are still as rampant as we were

> in the first years.


I agree COMPLETELY...I've been married over 31 years and have a STUPENDOUS time with my exquisite "black pudding";-). He's quite delicious.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do hope no wasteful, une-eco-friendly plastic

> products are used...


Actually, my new venture just commissioned an environmental study on plastic and rubber accessories. It turns out they contribute less to global warming than their man-powered organic equivalents while providing deeper and longer lasting consumer satisfaction. That goes for the battery operated ones, too.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lol oh come on Mick mac everyone has had a bit of

> girl on girl in their time, slightly blase about

> it now, been there bought the carpet and munched

> on it.>:D<


Nope never had my lino licked by a woman ;-)

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nope never had my lino licked by a woman ;-)


Glad to hear it. I've got you booked for a double helping of our tried and tested black pudding.


Let me know when you can take delivery - don't leave it too long or they'll go soft and squidgy.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LMFAO! HAL your're making my eyes water.

> Better start doing my stretches.


I'm soooo tempted to reply - but I'll get banned, I'm sure! You'll just have to use your imagination. Just think about what you've just written...

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.omax.co.uk/

>

> Some women swear by this........



Eeeeeeeewwwwww....looks 'ORRIBLE....my "black pudding" looks FAR more appetising (and easier on the digestive system too!) - perhaps I should hire him out...actually, he's just been made redundant...now there's a thought...


PS: Ladygooner, if you DO see my delicious "black pudding" - just so you know, he knows NOTHING about this thread - let alone my postings!!

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to hear your black pudding has been made

> redundant and of course I shan't mention a word to

> him about your postings! Although he may have more

> time on his hands now and post on the forum in

> which case he will see it all!



(GASP!)...Jeeezuss...I shall just have to employ HAL9000's tactic and claim that my account was hacked!


Oi! Why are'nt you hard at work - it's not 5 o'clock yet!?;-)


PS: thanks for kind words

At the risk of being called a prude (or have someone start a thread about how good I am at telling people off) can I say that I think this has gone on long enough.


This thread has been entirely hijacked by a small group with juvenille, smutty innuendo and in-jokes.


I actually think LE was serious in offering her services to help people enjoy a guilt-free and happy sex life. If the subsequent posts prove anything, it's that there is certainly a need for her services, as several posters don't seem to be able to treat sex as anything other than something dirty to snigger about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...