Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking of defending my family.


On reviewing the recent data, I've discovered that white people are violent.


I'm not saying anything against them, but I'm thinking we should put them out of the country. Some of them had brown hair, where do we put them? There was a blond one on the footage too, but they're the same.


Any thoughts on the ones with spots? I saw someone with acne in Spain. We should put them there.


There was one with a baseball hat. They wear those in America. They probably listen to music too. Neither music nor America are part of my culture. They should go home.


Does anyone have crime data on crimes committed by people who have either white skin, brown (or blond) hair, acne, listen to music or have American hats?


They all live together in things called families, DOWN THE ROAD FROM PEOPLE THEY WENT TO SCHOOL WITH.


I'm not saying anything against them though.


I just want to protect my family.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7692-white-mischief/
Share on other sites

I imagine it happens wherever white people live close to each other.


They should set up a specialist police unit, called operation milky or some such, focused on white-on-white crime.


I wouldn't have said it was rampant or ubiquitous, it just happens where we allow them to get together in one place, banging and shouting like some kind of tribal dance, they're still living in the dark ages. If they don't know how to be civilized we should send them home.


Or take them off benefits until they've passed an exam.


;-)

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The correct word is pervasive.

>

> The simple solution is to ban football.



But these violent whites love their football - if we ban it in public, they'll take it to the streets, unregulated: jumpers for goalposts, even getting children playing... that way madness lies, madness I tells ya...

Well this type of thing does happen in Africa all the time for various reasons (not generally sport related though) and with brutal savagery. There?s no justification for it but the perpetrators are tribal, deeply superstitious and without the benefits of modern education, a formal justice system and all the other things that thousands of years of civilisation bring.


So why in Ingerland Ingerland Ingerland? Our England innit. Best Country in the world. We had an Empire. Civilised the world we did.


What?s your excuse?

What about Huguenot?s idea about the exam? I think Stella, Oasis, cocaine and football should be a right to all those living in this country but only if you?ve passed some sort of exam on the cultural significance of white trainers and polo shirts.


Is discrimination based on appearance and cultural activity still racist if you belong to the same race group?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the perpetrators are

> tribal, deeply superstitious and without the

> benefits of modern education, a formal justice

> system and all the other things that thousands of

> years of civilisation bring.


Football supporters are strongly tribal too - in a different way of course, but still in a way which brings out the same primitive instinct.


Yes we have a justice system, but I don't know what the punishment is for having a punch-up after the match. Probably isn't enough to deter these people. Perhaps they even see an arrest as "earning their stripes" or something.


I do take your point, but at the end of the day, we're all humans. Violence exists in every walk of life.

Ah yes, the 'beautiful game', can't say watching it make me want to rush into the streets and start smacking people about the head or throw bricks through windows, then again I'm not a fan of warm ale and don't speak the Queens English, must be cos I'm a dirty foreigner, innit.


Some people are just looking for excuses to have a rumble, I heard one fella on the radio today proudly proclaiming how he and his mates traveled down from Manchester for the sole reason they heard there would be trouble and wanted to be part of it. Knob heads.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> True but I was probing at deeper questions.


Primal tribal behaviour - probably began as a useful survival instinct amongst the earliest Hominidae or, more likely, their Hominoidea ancestors - depends how deep you want to go?

Huguenot,


do you have anything better to do with your time than start threads that you know full well could descend (and I predict this one will) into a nasty and genuinely spiteful exchange, and that hurtful accusations of racsism will be bandied about in blind attempts at winning 'the arguement'.


I, personally see the thread for what it is. A slightly tongue in cheek yet stirring topic of debate. I'm not accusing you of anything but I'd like to ask that you think before posting what could turn into an upsetting experience that will further put off people from joining the forum and the discusions that take place.


I know you could call me a hypocrite, but I never get involved with threads that have the scent of race about them. Except this time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its a few years ago now, but I organised my end of year prom (for year 13) at Off the Cuff in Herne Hill - was on the cheaper side to rent and at that age, felt very cool and clubby. I had my own 18th at Whirled Cinema in Loughborough Junction but I'm not sure if they take event bookings like that anymore 
    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...