Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking of defending my family.


On reviewing the recent data, I've discovered that white people are violent.


I'm not saying anything against them, but I'm thinking we should put them out of the country. Some of them had brown hair, where do we put them? There was a blond one on the footage too, but they're the same.


Any thoughts on the ones with spots? I saw someone with acne in Spain. We should put them there.


There was one with a baseball hat. They wear those in America. They probably listen to music too. Neither music nor America are part of my culture. They should go home.


Does anyone have crime data on crimes committed by people who have either white skin, brown (or blond) hair, acne, listen to music or have American hats?


They all live together in things called families, DOWN THE ROAD FROM PEOPLE THEY WENT TO SCHOOL WITH.


I'm not saying anything against them though.


I just want to protect my family.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7692-white-mischief/
Share on other sites

I imagine it happens wherever white people live close to each other.


They should set up a specialist police unit, called operation milky or some such, focused on white-on-white crime.


I wouldn't have said it was rampant or ubiquitous, it just happens where we allow them to get together in one place, banging and shouting like some kind of tribal dance, they're still living in the dark ages. If they don't know how to be civilized we should send them home.


Or take them off benefits until they've passed an exam.


;-)

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The correct word is pervasive.

>

> The simple solution is to ban football.



But these violent whites love their football - if we ban it in public, they'll take it to the streets, unregulated: jumpers for goalposts, even getting children playing... that way madness lies, madness I tells ya...

Well this type of thing does happen in Africa all the time for various reasons (not generally sport related though) and with brutal savagery. There?s no justification for it but the perpetrators are tribal, deeply superstitious and without the benefits of modern education, a formal justice system and all the other things that thousands of years of civilisation bring.


So why in Ingerland Ingerland Ingerland? Our England innit. Best Country in the world. We had an Empire. Civilised the world we did.


What?s your excuse?

What about Huguenot?s idea about the exam? I think Stella, Oasis, cocaine and football should be a right to all those living in this country but only if you?ve passed some sort of exam on the cultural significance of white trainers and polo shirts.


Is discrimination based on appearance and cultural activity still racist if you belong to the same race group?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the perpetrators are

> tribal, deeply superstitious and without the

> benefits of modern education, a formal justice

> system and all the other things that thousands of

> years of civilisation bring.


Football supporters are strongly tribal too - in a different way of course, but still in a way which brings out the same primitive instinct.


Yes we have a justice system, but I don't know what the punishment is for having a punch-up after the match. Probably isn't enough to deter these people. Perhaps they even see an arrest as "earning their stripes" or something.


I do take your point, but at the end of the day, we're all humans. Violence exists in every walk of life.

Ah yes, the 'beautiful game', can't say watching it make me want to rush into the streets and start smacking people about the head or throw bricks through windows, then again I'm not a fan of warm ale and don't speak the Queens English, must be cos I'm a dirty foreigner, innit.


Some people are just looking for excuses to have a rumble, I heard one fella on the radio today proudly proclaiming how he and his mates traveled down from Manchester for the sole reason they heard there would be trouble and wanted to be part of it. Knob heads.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> True but I was probing at deeper questions.


Primal tribal behaviour - probably began as a useful survival instinct amongst the earliest Hominidae or, more likely, their Hominoidea ancestors - depends how deep you want to go?

Huguenot,


do you have anything better to do with your time than start threads that you know full well could descend (and I predict this one will) into a nasty and genuinely spiteful exchange, and that hurtful accusations of racsism will be bandied about in blind attempts at winning 'the arguement'.


I, personally see the thread for what it is. A slightly tongue in cheek yet stirring topic of debate. I'm not accusing you of anything but I'd like to ask that you think before posting what could turn into an upsetting experience that will further put off people from joining the forum and the discusions that take place.


I know you could call me a hypocrite, but I never get involved with threads that have the scent of race about them. Except this time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...