Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In the "Scotland" thread there was reference made to the British Isles. Some people still use the term although of course Republic of Ireland is clearly not "British". Is it correct to still use the term when referring to Great Britain and Ireland? I think the term implies British ownership or British rule, some think its purely a geographical name, but I suspect Republic of Ireland people are not comfortable with it.


[i'd put this in the Drawing Room but I suspect the Lounge debate will be more fun]

I dunno Micksy but wot I DO know is that at The Notting Hill Carnival that I attended yesterday I didn't think it was the greatest idea to sing "Rule Brittannia" which continually came into my head ( along with The Steptoe theme tune) for some bizarre reason.


So I stuck to listening to the Soca and superb it was too at 135 Decibels....>:D<

On the one hand, valid question - Ireland is not Britain - on the other hand, issue-y question - there are several variations on the names of a lot of land masses, including one in which the entire of Australia, New Zealand and the surrounding South Pacific Islands as a single continent is referred to as either Oceania, Australasia or just Australia.


In terms of political mapping, Great Britain is England, Wales and Scotland, The UK is adding N.Ireland, and Ireland/Eire is a separate place. Apparently the preferred term in politics for the whole Geographical she-bang is Britain and Ireland, which, based on the political definitions, technically omits Northern Ireland... argh! Is there a right answer?


I think that certain terms have been thrown around for so long that it can be difficult to make changes (as an Englishman and, therefore, the subject of none that have recent, painful memories, this is a very easy standpoint to champion), or next we'll be changing the name of London because it harks back to Londinium and we are no longer under the yoke of Roman rule etc where does the madness end etc etc... That said, The British Lions officially changed to British and Irish Lions in 2001, despite a long line of Irish players over it's previous history of not having Irish in the title. I think the exercising of a little lattitude and "it's ok, we know what you mean, we know you don't think you rule us" has greased the wheels, but we were imperialist basterds for a very long time, it's on maps and old documents all over the place, and getting round to apologising for it all and putting all of it right is taking a while.

In terms of political mapping, Great Britain is England, Wales and Scotland, The UK is adding N.Ireland, and Ireland/Eire is a separate place. Apparently the preferred term in politics for the whole she-bang is Britain and Ireland, which technically omits Northern Ireland...


Ireland is also a goegraphical land mass, so the term "Great Britain and Ireland" does not omit Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland is a country/state within Ireland, don't think anyone could argue with that.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or the East American Archipelago.


lol.


Just to show my ignorance, I always thought the British Isles referred to the land mass that is England, Wales and Scotland and all the other islands around it such as Isle of Man, Jersey, etc :-$

I now stand corrected :)


As for Australasia, personally (and I think most kiwis) I've never had a problem with the name (even though New Zealand isn't part of the name, probably because AustraZealand just sounds dumb), however if you refer to NZ as Australia that's another matter...

I, as part of the landed gentry, only ever refer to the shires outside the capital as the provinces where provincials live. The so called break away nations such as Scotland should be treated with a heavy hand like what the Russians did to Chechnya.


So, from here on out we shall refer to the collection of islands as Britannia, and just to keep the mick Irish happy it will sometimes be refered to as Bogtannia.


England


England is a beautiful and majestic land that invented the ironing board and was once the seat of an empire where the sun never set. It's home to the most prestigeous universities where our glorious literature flourishes and sets the trend. Our mathmaticians and engineers have taken the world by the hand and shown them how it's done. The world speaks English, the world is England.


Scotland


A bunch of foul mouthed, uncouth barbarians who are constantly whinging to Brussels about their claim to our oil. The question the Scots should ask themselves is where would they be if it wasn't for the gratuitous colonisation of the English. Their tribal government would still be run by village elders and they'd still be sacrificing their young to their pagan gods.


Wales


Insignificantly under populated retirement home where you can still get away with buggering farm yard animals.


Ireland (Republic and North)


A priest infested backwater full of wandering half wits who are more than happy to live up to their under achieving stereotype by singing for beer.

Half-wits you say.......begorrah we're not the only one's:


A man owned a small farm in outback Australia.




The Tax Office claimed he was not paying proper wages to his staff and sent a representative out to interview him.




?I need a list of your employees and how much you pay them,? demanded the rep.




?Well,? replied the farmer, "there?s my farm hand who?s been with me for 3 years. I pay him $500 a week plus free room and board. He also gets triple time for working on a Sunday and a slab of beer for a Happy Hour every Friday"




?The cook has been here for 18 months, and I pay her $400 per week plus free room and board. She doesn?t work on Sundays and I provide paid satellite television for free in her room.




?Then there?s the half-wit. He works about 18 hours every day and does about 90% of all the work around here. He makes about $40 per week, pays his own room and board, and I buy him a bottle of whiskey every Saturday night. He also sleeps with my wife occasionally.?




?That?s the guy I want to talk to...the half-wit,? says the agent.




?That would be me,? replied the farmer.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just waiting for Declan to enter the debate Quids.


Not sure what you're implying there Mick. I did after all start the 'Is there a God' thread in the Drawing Room so this is quite easy really. Of course there isn't a 'British Isles'. You may as well call them the Irish Isles. Once the lads here have returned what they borrowed i.e the 6 counties, shure we can come to some agreement as to what to call the little place. What about the Western European Islands for starters? Who decides what's 'official' anyway? I never agreed to it.

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Just waiting for Declan to enter the debate

> Quids.

>

> Not sure what you're implying there Mick. I did

> after all start the 'Is there a God' thread in the

> Drawing Room so this is quite easy really. Of

> course there isn't a 'British Isles'. You may as

> well call them the Irish Isles. Once the lads here

> have returned what they borrowed i.e the 6

> counties, shure we can come to some agreement as

> to what to call the little place. What about the

> Western European Islands for starters? Who decides

> what's 'official' anyway? I never agreed to it.



What Declan said - I knew he would spice things up and stick up to that nasty wolf.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?ve never been able to figure out exactly which

> part of Australia New Zealand is in.



ppffftt....you're confused, Australia is the West Island (to complement the North and South Islands) of New Zealand where we put all undesirables the idiots at customs let into the country, namely people who can't pronounce the word 'six', refer to a can of beer as a tinnie and sing songs about tying down their kangaroos. Oh and any stray South Africans that wander in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...