Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I had an email from the developer last week

> telling me how misguided my objections would be to

> a restaurant/bar on your street. They even had the

> cheek to tell me the ED Warehouse failed rather

> than the owner made a huge rent hike!


That's terrible! Does that mean development has begun and it'll definitely be a restaurant or bar? Is there anywhere I can lodge my own objections?


Thank you for the update!

Hi 85volga,

Commercial businesses each have commercial waste contracts for waste disposal. In an ideal world all the Lordship Lanes businesses would have one commercial waste contractor realising lots of bulk purchasing savings and ensuring a better service. When asked the business association SSBA didn't feel they wee suitable for this. But they're interested in forming a Business Improvement District (BID). If successful I could see this taking such a scheme forward and others. Bulk energy buying being another ya to save lots of cash for local indie businesses.

Until then though please email specific locations and times troubling you and I will try and improve.


Hi Zenoria,

I've not spotted any planning application yet. If you spot a planning notice for the site on any lamp posts please prod me ASAP.

Maybe the first check should be that the bars & restaurants have the correct licence to place tables & chairs outside! I believe it's called a shop front licence.

Businesses are entitled to use whatever licensed waste carrier they choose. Where do you suggest the largd euro bins are kept? They will block the pavements. Bags are collected daily thats why left on street for collecting. Stop complaining over non issues.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi unlurked,

> Large Eurobins are necessary because Lordship Lane

> businesses don;t work in concert with one cheaper

> contractor.



If a business has a daily collection bins are not needed.

Sue Wrote:


> I did auto top-up in the days before my freedom

> pass. It was very easy and meant I never had to

> worry at all about the Oyster card running out.

>

> But I agree if you are travelling beyond the

> Oyster zone you do still need to use a ticket

> office, at least until such time as they change

> the system - I don't think you can get the add-on

> ticket at a machine, can you?


You can actually, at least on the Southern machines.

I've just experimented with the ED one.


You need to select Boundary Zone n (where n=6 for a freedom

pass holder). It finds itself among all the 'B' stations.

Hi LouiseC,

As Denmark Hill also has TfL services there I've asked GLA Assembly Member Caroline Pidgeon if she can apply pressure for a second ticket machine and whether the Camberwell Society idea of opening up another entrance could be explored.

I suspect resistance due to the amount of money already spent on Denmark Hill - even if all that cash resulted in more congestion!


LouiseC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi James, could you possibly speak to the train

> company re: Denmark Hill having an extra ticket

> machine, it's even busier than ED, so having only

> one really isn't viable. If people could update

> Oyster cards at the ticket office this would also

> help, are you aware of any plans for this to

> happen?

James ,apologies if this has already have been raised but - junction of Whately Rd and Lordship Lane ,turning right into Lordship Lane from Whately Rd ,vision is badly obscured for motorists by recycling bins .


Could they be relocated ?

Hi ITATM,

Yes, but useful to have more people highlight this.


Circa 3 months ago I asked council officers to assess whether the guardrailings could be removed and recyclnig repositioned. It is taking a lot of chasing to make progress on this I'm afraid but I'm still chasing. I'm hopeful that by the summer it will be sorted.


Making Lordship Lane 20mph will have helped, certainly makes removing the guardrailing possible, by reducing speeds a smidgen.

James ,just to be clear the guardrailing is not a problem . It is the large litter/recycling bins that are the problem .

They have recently appeared in this position and presumably could easily be removed .


20mph not an element in positioning of bins .

So, James, the council have done as you requested and relocated the recycling bins - but only from one end of the railings to the other. I do appreciate now being able to see the road instead of the bins (where they were before) but they are now very conspicuous as the first thing you see, rather than the road, when you look to the right at this junction. Do you think the council consider this resolves the problem of the obstructed view at this junction. Perhaps you could take a look and see what you think?

When I drove past the bins today I realised that they weren't fixed and could easily ( tho not if recovering from surgery ) be shoved along .


If I'd realised that I wouldn't have raised the issue in the first place . Thanks to whoever has moved them . I'm afraid I don't quite understand the point Kiera makes .

hi James

Apologies if you already have had postings about this topic..but I was really upset, along with many other ED residents, to hear that Chris Burgess's grocers on Northcross rd, has been forced to close by bailiffs who changed the locks last week (I hear there is a short reprieve of maybe a couple of weeks)This as you know, has been a family run business for 47 yrs, and has been a valuable, good quality, and much loved business to many of us who chose to support him, rather than buy from the supermarkets. I just wonder, is there anything that we can collectively do, to change this decision? I know it has been a tortuous 'family' rift which made the lease a problem, but many of us signed petitions against closure, which apparently were not even looked at by the delegation who made the decision,of 4-2 against saving it..

Can you shed any further light on this, and what, if anything, we can do? I cannot believe the ED can lose a much needed, and only grocers.,,I am gutted

many thanks,Sue

Hi sue k,

Yes I supported Chris by attending the. planning Committee and speaking against the planning application as a ward councillor. As ward councillors my colleagues cllr Jonathan Mitchell, cllr Rosie Shimell and myself had called this application in to be decided by councillors. Officers recommended granting planning permission and by a majority the committee granted permission. Very disappointing.


The developers were clear to the planning committee they'd like to talk to Chris which was obvious at the time a shallow promise since sadly born out by events.


Since that committee we've been trying to find a different shop unit to transfer the business into. I'm still hopeful but their will probably be a gap.


If anyone knows of a local shop unit available please let Chris know ASAP.

Some weeks ago I was asked about whether a second ticket machine could be installed at Denmark Hill station due to congestion.


I asked Lib Dem GLA Assembly Member for help. She contacted TfL first who referred her to the Train Operating Company. They relinquish this station at the calendar year end to a different TOC. But they were sorry for any queueing - and highlgihted it's in their interest to sell tickets. They will monitor queueing and try ensuring staff with hand held tickets machine are their more often and look to open a second ticket office window.

If this doesnt solve the problem then they may recommend the next TOC installs a second machine.


She plans to meet with them again around June. So please do feed problems to me by email and I'll brief her about ED resident views.

Hi James.


Hoping you can help or point me in the direction of who can. Two issues.


I live on Maxted Road in SE15. More and more frequently we are getting full size coaches coming down our road having turned off Bellenden and then trying to turn left or right onto Nutbrook St and then gradually wind their way though onto East Dulwich Road. The problem is that a massive coach (I'm talking 70-80 seaters) does not fit on a narrow residential street with parked cars both sides.


They are getting stuck, blocking traffic and causing chaos. Often late into the evening. I have a suspicion they are coming from the Peckham Lodge which seems popular with large groups of European students (the coaches are normally overseas registered). I'm guessing their sat-navs just send them that way. But it's really not a good idea. Is there any way of either making an instruction to the owner of the Lodge to direct coaches via Camberwell and Dog Kennel Hill or putting up signage stating coaches are not permitted?


2) Why was the beautiful and wildlife-friendly cherry plum tree at the bottom of Warwick Gardens cut down?

Hi James,


We would like to petition to get some trees/hedges planted on the goose green playground to block the noise/pollution coming from East Dulwich Road. the Goose Green playground is probably the best in the area (cf. Peckham Rye, Dulwich Park and the playground by Sainsbury's) and its a shame to think what the kids are actually breathing in.


If there is a better way to try and get this installed, please let me know.


Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...