Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, last year possibly October community police called to my home in SE5 and left two bottles of the stuff. I supplied my name and address on a form that was relevant to paint within bottle. Pity I didn't put a blob of it on the sat nav that was nicked from our car in Feb this year!

Same here- PCSO called and left me the kit. You sign a statement showing that it is unique to you


Now all my vauables are dabbed and a sticker on the front door declares as such to Billy Burglar


I have even put a smigeon behind each ear, in case i am kidnapped

Thanks for reminding me of that thread, Mark. That's brightened up my morning no end!


eater81 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SelectDNA? Does that mean that the property gets

> marked with your own DNA as a means of identifying

> you as its owner?

>

> If that is the case then it sounds more like a

> crafty attempt by the police to build up their

> sinister DNA database on the sly!

>

> SAY NO TO THE BIG BROTHER STATE!!!!

East dulwich councillors asked the local Police Safer Neighbourhood Team led by sgt Duncan Jackson what would their number one proprioty for crime prevention in East Dulwich. They said they were given 100 Smartwater property marking kits, on a good year, by the Met Police. They suggested they'd prefer SelectaDNA. So the Lib Dem East Dulwich cllrs responded by providing 1,000 SelectaDNA property marking kits.


We also suggested to the Police they deploy these properry marking kits to innoculate houses where burglary has taken place and their neighbours for 50m. Most burglaries are repeats around previous burglaries. They know the house layouts so more certainty what they'll meet.


I'm told all the kits have been deployed. 1,000 out of 5,200 homes in East Dulwich ward. Any burglar of an East Dulwich home has an 18% chance of stealing proprty that will get them or any fencer nicked.


We anticipate buying another 1,000 property marking kits this year.

If you'd like one for your home then let the local Police know [email protected]

As a follow up on this and the previous thread from January


I would like to clear something up

Firstly Smartwater and SelectaDNA are NOTthe same product


SelectaDNA uses a scientificaly desigend and manufactured DNA code unique to each kit ( over 1 billion possible combinations) these DNA codes CANNOT be confused with 'normal' or Human DNA as they are modified to stop this occuring.

Once purchased and registered to the database use is free.


Smartwater contains NO DNA it utilises a combination of chemicals to act as markers. The real downside about smartwater is that they have a reagistra=tion fee of over ?10 per year to keepyou on the database don't pay it your details are deleted and if the police find your gear they will not be able to repatriate it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...