Jump to content

Recommended Posts

May be a bit harsh, but everyones a critic especially of the chair's hard efforts (poor thing HAD to read the entire HAL v Huguenot bitch slap for instance) and can wax lyrical about what should be, but not a single offer on doing anything about it, and yes that's depressing.


And yes, earn it lackey!!!

I'm glad to have been working hard and have missed most of this debate - it seems to have become a bit heated.


Its become a debate between good and bad:


Moos = Good

Bigbadwolf = Bad (it does what it says on the tin and I generally find it funny)


But not all that's bad is bad for you and not all thats good is good for you either. Too much good is dull and too much bad is very bad.


Good and Bad forced together tend to find a balance where neither of them is happy - that's what has happened here - but it was entertaining.

iaineasy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No Iain. As usual Moos was right to tell me off.

> It was a slipshod post and she was right to pull

> me up on it. Annaj and RosieH usually take over if

> Moos isn't keeping an eye on me.

> -------------------------------------------

>

>

> I have no doubt about that BBW. Still, glad to see

> you can take it on the chin when your being an

> A%$?hole and people tell you! Believe it or not I

> think that's worth a little respect.

> :)-D



Iaineasy, I have to say that I agree with you...actually I believe that BBW might in fact be a BBR (bigbadrhino) - he certainly appears to have the skin of one. Many people might have difficulty accepting the regular waves of criticism he seems to "take on the chin".


So, some respect from me too.>:D<. (Do excuse "ghastly emotion"...but I like them).

The current chair should stay, but get more involved, would be my opinion. An intersting point was made earlier, before BBW started being BBW, someone said they liked the Drawing Room, but found it a bit intimidating. I do think that a lot of the posts in there try so hard to sound all knowledgable, and spot on, even if hey state the exact opposite to the previous knowledgable and spot on post. This then can be off putting for someone who just wants to offer an opinion, without wanting the rest of the world to think "aren't they clever". This doesn't bother me personally of course, because I am fucking clever! :-S

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

... the chair ... poor thing ...


Is this a clue as to the Chair's identity?


Who would mockney refer to as "poor thing"?


Surely, someone he feels protective towards, superior to, even? A female, perhaps?


Or am I reading too much into this?

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The current chair should stay, but get more

> involved, would be my opinion. An intersting point

> was made earlier, before BBW started being BBW,

> someone said they liked the Drawing Room, but

> found it a bit intimidating. I do think that a lot

> of the posts in there try so hard to sound all

> knowledgable, and spot on, even if hey state the

> exact opposite to the previous knowledgable and

> spot on post. This then can be off putting for

> someone who just wants to offer an opinion,

> without wanting the rest of the world to think

> "aren't they clever". This doesn't bother me

> personally of course, because I am @#$%& clever!

> :-S


That's very funny Keef - and spot on. Everyone in the DR posts hoping everyone else will respond saying "you're spot on -that's the right answer - you're a genius"


But that never happens - people just disagree, because everyone else thinks they have the perfect viewpoint.


I had one go at it and gave up.

"The Chair wishes to have HAL9000's babies."


You're not allowed to post in the lounge as the chair. Whoever you are, don't ever come in here again with that mask on.


I'm being serious as well. I'm not allowed in your drawing room so who the hell do you think you are coming in here strutting about the place when no one can identify you. P_ss off out of here!!

Good point Hal. I started it because I discovered that after the forums overhall the eye in the sky had neglected to extend my ban into the drawing/yawning room. I genuinely wanted to garner a positive response but it was also admittedly an experiment to see if I could get away with it. I then started a thread about smuggling and it was moved to the lounge and I was banned from the drawing room.


I'm not playing a sympathy card but I'm not blaming admin either. I simply can't be trusted with all the high brow debaters although f_ck knows how Quids gets away with it.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I simply can't be trusted


I'm sure you could control yourself if you put your mind to it.


> with all the high brow debaters


Ha! What highbrow debaters? It's just the same old crowd that hangs around in the lounge but without the one-liners.


If the Drawing Room is to survive and flourish it needs to be a place where everyone feels comfortable and welcome.


It's supposed to be a place to discuss serious subjects not an exclusive retreat for highbrow debaters. Everyone is entitled to express their opinion on serious issues - you included.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...