Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Deepest apologies for returning to the topic of the thread. Quids you may be surprised to hear this! but I have read a Dan Brown book once, although I'm not stupid enough to pay to buy a hardcover and lug it around. The furthest I'd go would be to borrow a paperback.


I think there's room in the world for a well-plotted thriller, with mysteries that are difficult to untangle. Shame they so often seem to go with silly conspiracy theories and cardboard characters, though.

I don't mind admitting that I actually rather enjoyed Angels & Demons, which I acttually read before the Da Vinci Code, but after all the DC hype. What is not to enjoy, it's a fun story, and easy reading. Da Vinci Code was dull, and completely overrated.


The problem is that people then start talking like the books are literary greats, and that gets up the nose of some people.


Harry Potter books are kids books, which then got popular, so increasingly became aimed at an older audience. I personally think they are a good laugh, but again, it doesn't mean I think that annoying woman is some literary genius, more a woman who took an old idea, and expanded on it with some skill.

I guess it's about how impossible it is to work out what will cPture the public imagination.


I grew up enjoying lots of boys-with-magic-powers type books, what's not to love. But there are hundreds of them, HP is no better or worse, so I'm at a total loss why it did so well.


I've read any number of hackneyed thrillers I picked up at the airport and threw into a bin at the other end (perhaps people missing the bin and hitting the bench is where the myth comes from TM). I enjoy not having to think when on a plane tired and trying to pretend I'm not in a high explosive building 40000 ft of the floor.

Many of those thrillers have dealt with Templars and Gnostics and religion (I think I mentioned before a very enjoyable one about Jesus being alive and well and drug dealing in Sydney) so nowt wrong with these books per se.


But again I've non idea why DVC did so well, it's bizarre, like HP before it it is utterly derivative and averagely written.

I guess mcdonalds proves you don't need to be good to be popular but I hate adults telling me I MUST read HP or I have no imagination, or the loons who think there is some truth in DVC.

For goodness sake I barely believe Jesus existed and certainly don't believe in his divinity, why would I care if he shagged someone?


Anyway Eco's Foucault's Pendilum should be prescribed as the perfect antidote to anyone infected by DVC syndrome. Pacy, thrilling, intellignet, amusing and brilliantly written, for once what really is not to like?

Ruth Kelly tried to kill you?


I think people like to feel part of something bigger - and there comes a point where it feels perverse not to have read something. I can't see the harm in it. I suppose you can argue that publishers cut their lists to a few banker genres and stop investing in new writing.


But there still seem to be plenty of books piled up in Chener, Review, and so on that haven't rolled out of a lorry straight onto Tesco's 20% off shelf.


(Naturally I haven't read any Rowling or Brown myself, chiefly spending my time at the moment reading 19th Century Ghazals in the original Urdu)

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Us I worked with an opus dei chap for five years

> and he never once tried to kill ke despite my

> regular blaspheming.

> Though on the other side of the coin...Ruth

> Kelly....


They're more underhanded than that. They like to hack forum accounts in order to make it look like their opponents are unable to spell/construct a sentence. Sinister stuff.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway Eco's Foucault's Pendilum should be

> prescribed as the perfect antidote to anyone

> infected by DVC syndrome. Pacy, thrilling,

> intellignet, amusing and brilliantly written, for

> once what really is not to like?


A great book, but bloody hard work, I was constantly having to look up words in the dictionary and read sentences 3 or 4 times to work out what they had said... not good for the ego.

The Name of the Rose and Foucault's Pendulum were masterpieces in my view. I found Eco's subsequent novels somewhat disappointing.


In real life professor Eco is a semiotician: one who studies signs and symbols and their meaning. Dan Brown describes Robert Langdon as a ?symbologist,? which is a clumsy term for semiotician.


My guess is that Brown chose symbologist to obscure the influence Eco had on his work.

Piers, I dare say that the best rock guitarist in the world, is someone we've never heard of, who plays in local pubs. The best song in the world, is probably something written by some guy we've never heard of, and quite likely, the best thriller ever written is sitting on a publisher's desk somewhere, and will never see the shelves of WH Smith's.


Dan Brown and J K Rowling got lucky, just like all the bands that make it, and the songwriters who happen to get heard by the right person on the right night.


They then got pushed by clever marketing people.


Look at Blair Witch, what a load of gash, but half the world thought it was a documentary!

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Quids you may be surprised to hear

this! but I have read a Dan Brown book once,


Although you can't see us Moos, the rest of the EDF have become a living Bateman cartoon at hearing this.

My monocle has caromed off the ceiling, my tincture has splashed all over the founder's portrait and I've bitten through the stem of my favourite Meerschaum.

I wonder how anyone else reacted?

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Although you can't see us Moos, the rest of the

> EDF have become a living Bateman cartoon at

> hearing this.

> My monocle has caromed off the ceiling, my

> tincture has splashed all over the founder's

> portrait and I've bitten through the stem of my

> favourite Meerschaum.

> I wonder how anyone else reacted?


Dear Hona, I sincerely apologise for having ruffled your equilibrium. Please imagine a cool, smooth Moosian hand on your fevered brow, stroking away your discombobulation.


I'm sure no-one else so much as swirled their G&Ts at the news. I have confessed to C2 tastes before now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...