Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just came to me randomly like....


Would learn them early about the man

They could moan like buggery about me wasting their hard earned on things like Stella


I was thinking maybe 20% for the little fella (currently on ?4 a month gross) and 40% for me princess (?6 per calender month) - though I might make hers 50% to punish her for her contribution to sweet inflation on Northcross Road and to rebuild my beer fridge contents

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8049-should-pocket-money-be-taxed/
Share on other sites

I actually have friends (a brother and sister) whose dad did that when they were growing up, well teenagers at least. He paid each of them quite an amount at the beginning of each month and then deducted school fees, transport, savings, university fund etc.


Funnily enough he?s not the money obsessed skinflint you would expect. Actually quite a chilled out generous guy.

Put them on self-assessment, Quids, warning them they will need to put a bit by each month for the taxman. Then leave them notes at various times of the year reminding them that if they miss the deadline for completing the form they'll be subject to incremental penalties.


After all that, 18 months after they've submitted their form and payment has been agreed, send them a huge rebate. Then demand repayment of the rebate, that was paid in error. Then give them a phone number in Scotland to call if they have any queries.

Actually Quids it'd be an opportunity to teach them history and pop at the same time.

Tax 'em on a 'one for you, nineteen for me' basis.

Make sure you have the 'life's not fair' speech lined up.

If their squeaks of protest become intolerable put your fingers in your ears and chant "Paul was the walrus" over and over again.

I wouldn't do it public though, some of these mental health professionals can be duecedly nosey, not to say offensive.

I remember hearing about a family the TV based a production on in the US of A who pooled all their resources including what the kids earned delivering papers etc.

They ran the home as if it were a small country, and they apportioned the money out for food, mortgage, transport, clothes and Tax if I remember correctly.

If there was an excess then that went on holidays, entertainment, and other 'non-essentials'.


I think every politician should be trained this way before embarking on their careers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...