Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I use it when I have to but it never gets easier.


Quite chaotic and cramped, now introduced fast track security and reserved seating areas in the main area. I don't warm to it. Contrast this when I first used in 25 years ago and it was empty.


I've tried numerous ways of getting there - Stansted Express. It isn't, it runs on slow commuter lines, it is expensive and has no competition. I missed a flight once when it totally facked up first thing (5am) in the morning.


Driving - hit and miss on the M11 and parking that is twice as expensive as others airports.


The coach from Stratford - again fingers crossed on the M11 but avoids the crossing the river bottle neck. Terravision are cheap but increasingly more nasty, and came back today on National Express, much more upmarket for the ?2 premium, but they cancelled a service without telling us customers so an extra 30 mins plus the big dealy due to an incident on the A12.


I'm grumpy as I got back home 2 1/2 hours late and tired after a very early start. Issue today was also poor weather at Stansted delaying outgoing flight.


I do have problems with other airports, but never the level of Stansted.


It would be just super to hear what others think, inlcuding some tips how to make better use of it.


Cheerio

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/80870-stansted-airport-views-please/
Share on other sites

Also very bloody annoying is that they now charge for "Express setdown" of passengers - if memory serves me its ?2 for up to 10 mins, then ?2 per minute after that. If you want a free drop off, it's mid-stay parking and catch the shuttle.


Not passenger friendly at all.

I used to use Stansted a lot - outside of the height of rush hour it was a predictable 1 hour drive and there were plenty of cheap and reliable 'meet and greet' parking firms, so you could just pull up outside and walk straight in. Now the traffic is awful and somehow the price of parking has gone up and the service level has gone down - no idea why - so I just avoid using it if at all possible. There don't seem to be many places you can only get to from Stansted, and these days I find that half the time it's as cheap to fly to Europe on BA from Heathrow T5, which by the standards of most international airports is a pleasure. Sorry - no more helpful tips.
It's amazing but true that BA - when booked on the website - offer really good deals, especially if you take only hand luggage. By the time you add in extras on "budget" airlines and the expense and faff of getting to places like Luton and Stansted (which auto-correct would have as "stagnated"), BA and other traditional airlines are very good value. Their flights tend not to go at unpleasant times, too.

Thanks for your views - I too noticed the 'pay to drop' - not done at other airports.


Without this getting into a 'fly another airline' there are simply times when no one else does the route so I have to use it.


I used to do BA but they reationalised many of their short European routes and reduced their Gatwick service which is the obvious airport of choice - so now use Sleazyjet on many occasions. But even Luton is better than STN.


Anyway perhaps someone has something nice to say about the experience there. It one design awards don't you know.

It is terrible, Makes my blood boil everytime. At times, the price difference to my home country between ryainair and say ba is several hundred pounds for an hour long flight so i have grinned and tried to bear it.

Luckily Norwegian has started to fly to where I need to go and its from gatwick. Much more pleasant and still good price.


Ryanair and I finally parted ways forever after they upset my non english speaking father with severe heartproblems to the point wherrle he was close to tears. I will jever forgive them for that. Bullies, cant stand them

OK you are all in agreement with me, but still interested in how best to use Stansted when I have to.


And also whether there are any pro stansted views out there.


Rabbitears, you forgot London Manston, London Lydd, London Northolt, London Shorham, London Croydon Airport, London Oxford Airport etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was a marketing approach to get kids to do exactly the opposite.  ie watch the programme.  'Why don't you' was very progressive at the time.
    • I agree its good to have a conversation about what Lordship lane really needs and I feel we are doing that in this forum; and some trying to steer it away from what commerce needs (lordship lane) and toward what people need, particularly our future generations who are being left a fractured future and are responding with higher suicide rates and depression.  no doubt the world of profit will win, but that is why some of us wish to speak out even if in vain.   I agree with you that there may be some underage drink drugs but would we all prefer that to be done behind closed doors .... I think more dangerous actually.   I applaud your optimism that dulwich estates could consider a skatepark into Dulwich park, maybe, although it could have closing time, insurance, safety issues. It would be great if a developer wants to include a skatepark, but I wonder what he would gain from that in terms of his profit.  I would rather give the benefit of doubt to those who leave behind the empty digital world and bravely try something communal, generative, challenging.   In the 1970s a tv programme urged teenagers to  "turn off your TV set and do something less boring instead" only some families can afford clubs......        
    • Just gone passed Love Dulwich cafe on the bus and there’s a sign outside stating “new Turkish restaurant opening soon” - I know the owners are Turkish but are they converting it already? 
    • I was surprised to learn that East Dulwich Picturehouse now only screens PG-rated films for their baby-friendly showings, unlike other Picturehouse branches. Apparently, this change happened after a complaint to the council about showing films above a PG rating to infants. Afaik, this policy only applies to this  branch. As a local parent, I find this frustrating. It limits our options, especially when many of us would love the chance to watch a wider range of films while caring for our little ones. For example, during Oscar Week, only one vintage film is being shown. Are we really expected to only consume toddler-focused content, like Cocomelon? I also worry about the precedent this sets. If other institutions, like the Tate or the National Portrait Gallery, applied similar restrictions, parents could be left with only child-oriented content. Babies under one don’t fully comprehend adult themes, so shouldn’t there be more flexibility? I’d love to hear what others think—should this policy be reconsidered?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...