Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was thinking of all the secondary schools in South London that no longer is around anymore but was very well known in 70s & 80s I went to a girls school called Priory Park in Clapham North we then mixed with Stockwell Manor which now an Academy and my old school is now an annexe for Lambeth College. Be nice to know what school anyone else went to or remember?

Ridgely wrote:


I have heard of that school I think Ken Livingston went there?


***


He did. Linton Kwesi Johnson was another pupil and so was Danny Williams who knocked out Mike Tyson inside four rounds. It was a rough and tough school. No place for shrinking violets.

There have been loads of changes to the schools in and around the se22 area.

Honour Oak Girls School became Waverley and is now Harris girls.

William Penn briefly became Dulwich High school for boys. It then closed and Charter now occupies refurbished buildings on the site.

Friern girls school was empty for several years. It was then demolished and the site used as a temporary site for another school. Harris Boys School is now in a new building on the site.

St. John's and St. Clements primary school was in North Cross Road. The buildings have been converted to residential and the school now occupies the buildings previously used by Thomas Calton school.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...