Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sophiesofa, no it's not particularly safe - use

> cold water not hot. Here's a useful site:

>

> Thawing Options



Thanks Peckhamgatecrasher and sorry for going off topic admin.

"Indeed and I doff my hat to BigBadWolf for his intuitive detective work."



Well well well...what's this then eh. Me being thanked, surely not.


However...


I can't take credit for sniffing out Nigee as ol' Mike did a good job of slipping under my radar, hat's off to him I say. I sniffed him out when he came on here as HonaloochieA. I personally don't see what the big deal is. I think it's great sport for Micky the thicky to see if he can pass himself off as a genuine poster, a bit like playing 'Where's Wally', but with a genuine wally.



"However I believe my response is more appropriate than BBW's "F_ck off Mikecg. You doss c_nt."



Come now admin, I bet you've been tempted to call me far worse in the past. Since I did such a thankless and sterling task of chasing Mike off in the "shirtlifter in a lift" thread, I think I should have my ban lifted on posting threads in the lounge.

  • Administrator

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think I should have my ban lifted on posting threads in the lounge.


OK in light of your community spirit I shall lift the ban, but it is not an excuse start threads about tits, arses and front bottoms that lower the tone of the forum.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We only want threads on well-heeled, respectable

> tits, arses and front bottoms...


What's the House Of Lords got to do with it, Brendan?

Honestly it's like Ben Elton's in the room, isn't it?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do wish Brendan wouldn't go on and on about his

> esteemed organ, it's rather embarrassing. Really

> Brendan, it's just a prick, get over it.


Alright, who's been letting Moos watch Loose Women?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...