Jump to content

David Cameron's wife has perfect teeth


Mick Mac

Recommended Posts

The current incumbents might leave a lot to be desired, but they are still a prefereable option to the Conservative party if you are working class. They have a working class tradition whereas the Conservatives don't. I support Tottenham Hotspurs and will do until I die, despite some of the crap that's managed or played for them. I could never support another team, especially their most bitter rivals, Arsenal. My support of the Labour party runs along the same lines.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are other options other than the conservative party. Thinking that there aren't is just clinging on to outdated ideology based on social constructs that no longer really apply to the world we live in.


Not that I?m criticising your choice of political support in any way. Or that I have any right to criticize anyone?s political choices. In fact I find it quite admirable. I just feel that people need to break away from the limiting sort of ?us vs them? business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to PM admin. Why can't any of you stay on topic (stomps foot)?


David Cameron's wife should have perfect teeth, you know that they cost her daddy a fortune... Veneers that obvious just look cheap in my opinion. As for the rave reviews about her wardrobe, where are the journalists coming from with such lies? You could purchase Samantha Cameron's entire wardrobe for less than ?100 in a tiny branch of M&S that sold mostly food - like Brixton. She dresses like Wendy Craig in Butterflies - very middle class 1980's and not in a trendy way.


Yes she has the whole glossy, rich girl hair thing (don't we all - smirk!), but it looks lank and could do with a good cut. I should imagine that she wears enormous pants and bras with huge straps too, and Opium perfume.


If we must have a complete arse for our next prime minister, he could at least provide us with a style icon for a wife, although I should say that we must be grateful that we will not be forced to endure a complete throllop, like some of our neigbours...(frowns through plantation shutters towards France)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ahh!! Poor snail, isn't nature cruel!
    • But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs? Exactly! When the "small vocal minority" was given a mouthpiece that proved it was anything other than small then some have repeatedly tried to discredit the mouthpiece.  The far-left has never been very good at accountability and One Dulwich is forcing our local councillors and council to be accountable to constituents and it wouldn't surprise me if the council are behind a lot of the depositioning activities as One Dulwich is stopping them from getting CPZs rolled out and must be seen as a huge thorn in the side of the idealogical plan they have. Southwark Labour has a long track record of trying to stifle constituents with a view that differs from theirs (see Cllr Leo Pollack for one example) or depositioning anyone trying to represent them (see Cllr Williams during the infamous Cllr Rose "mansplaining" episode. But you know, some think it's One Dulwich that are the greatest threat to local democracy and should not be trusted! 😉
    • A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...