Jump to content

Recommended Posts

choking on your own vomit is 'natural causes'.


But it is not pulmonary oedema, which is what the post mortem appears to have found. To speculate blindly is one thing (and I've already covered my opinion on what kind of thing), but just ignoring announcements of fact to continue doing so - what's going on with you lot?!


And ordinarily I would be enjoing the details of *Bob*'s past too, except they appear to be getting paraded as a CV of 1st hand experience as if that settles him firmly into the expert witness chair.

Cake and eat it titch.

You either give a shit or not but you seem to be want it both ways.


I'm pretty sure we were discussing it because we're bored.


There were some calls for a bit of respect for the deceased but I didn't spot any 'fake grief' leave alone any of the nauseating variety (mind you there was some of the mawkish variety on the jade goody rip thread but that's another frying pan to jump into).


We can discuss my deceased uncle if you like but even I hardly knew him so probably won't generate much interest.

bignumber5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And ordinarily I would be enjoing the details of

> *Bob*'s past too, except they appear to be getting

> paraded as a CV of 1st hand experience as if that

> settles him firmly into the expert witness chair.



I admit I don't speak for everyone in this matter.

At this point it's probably just me and another million people (who've had the same experiences) thinking the same thing.

The Boyzone singer Stephen Gately died of natural causes, a post-mortem examination in Spain has established.

An official said he suffered pulmonary oedema, which is an accumulation of fluid on the lungs.

The 33-year-old star was found dead at his holiday home in Majorca on Saturday. The judge said his body can now be flown home.


Seems my forensic pathologist career has come to a sudden end.


As for beds ?1million does not buy much in Port Andraxt

I know nothing and really don't want to argue with Annaj, but according to the ubiquitous Wikipedia, non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema can be attributed to 'Aspiration, e.g., gastric fluid or in case of drowning' so maybe the coroner is using it in that sense?


However, even that is still ghoulish speculation and I've quite nauseated myself.


.

Are there any links between pulmonary oedema and solvent abuse - such as GHB?


Indeed, if you were to google "pulmonary oedema GHB".. would it bring up any results?



Purely from a speculative layman's point of view, of course. I leave the real facts to doctors and the Coroner.

Well, *Bob*, you've certainly opened my eyes.

If I'd known I could acheive the same level of knowledge by Goggling I wouldn't have bothered with the six years of study, the ten years of experience, the long working hours or the spare time spent studying for yet more exams. Silly me.


Do me a favour and find where, in any of my posts, I have said drugs were not a possibility.

I haven't (except, of course, when I quoted the officer of the court who said that drugs were not the cause of death, but don't worry about that, she's probably not just as good at Googling as you are).

That was never my point.

My point was that were other possibilities and that I don't like automatic conclusions based on presumptions about lifestyle.


But why worry about details like what's actually being said or trashing someones feelings if there's an opportunity to be superior, smug and, oh, ever so witty. That's the *Bob* way isn't it?

Anna. You're being massively daft.


Me having an unprofessional and speculative opinion about the demise SG in no way denigrates your six years of study.


If you see read about an incident in the news, or see it on the telly - a murder, an accident, a disappearance, a whatever, I expect you sit there in stony silence, refusing to speculate idly with partner or friends until all the facts are in from all the relevant professionals and presented in triplicate. Do you?


Assuming SG, his family and friends aren't morbidly trawling every website everywhere for discussion about his death,

the only feelings I seem to be trashing here are yours, in which case, seriously - get over it.


The *Bob* way (whatever that is) is generally to say what I think. Otherwise, what's the point of being here?

Maybe I am being daft, but just as your view is informed by your own past experience mine is coloured by mine.


This brings back memories of a previous, in many ways different, but in some ways similar, situation for me and the damage done by such public speculation. Of course I have an opinion and of course I speculate, but I didn't see the need for it here.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

... just as your view is

> informed by your own past experience mine is

> coloured by mine.


I think there's room for both.

I don't think I could have underlined my lack of expertise/professionalism/facts any more if I'd tried.


Note I have also offered ill-informed opinion on surveying, carpentry, interior design, DIY electrical work and rodent control - so please don't feel personally attacked on a professional level.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was talking to my brother in the law last weekend who works for a different water company. He said he and his colleagues watch TW’s woes with a mixed of horror, disbelief and then relief that they work for a different water company. Worth a watch. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00284vt
    • But Thatcher is dead. Nobody since has brought the utilities back under public ownership (if that's the right term). So there are many people who could be blamed. Meanwhile the shareholders get richer and everyone else gets increasing bills and a poorer service. Plus as said above, a massive waste of a limited resource like water. Not to mention the polluted rivers and seas. At least the privatisation of the railways is being reversed. Hopefully water may be on the list somewhere.
    • That's really helpful. Do the Community Councils still exist? It sounds to me that whoever the contact is on the council who has sorted out the North Cross Road notice board and put the new list of councillors in it must at least have access to the key for that one? Unless it was one of the unlocked ones. And of course if somebody knows where the keys are, they may have no idea that people are looking for them or that this forum thread exists. Which are the notice boards which are not locked?  The very helpful locksmith near the station (?Callows?)  might be able to provide keys for them, or if not, new locks, in return for some local publicity? In fact, they may be able to advise in general, rather than keep trying unresponsive people at the council. But then of course there is still the question of who is going to take responsibility for putting appropriate East Dulwich community information into them and updating it as necessary.
    • Our residents' association used to have keys many moons ago, but when locks were changed, we tried everyone (including ward councillors) to get keys to no avail. A couple of boards are not locked. The Community Councils originally paid for all the notice boards in Dulwich. May have come under the Cleaner Greener budget.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...