Jump to content

Does anyone else miss TLS's + Bigbadwolf's posts?

daizie

By daizie
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann

SeanMacGabhann

Posted
Posted

eh? When did I say you were offensive Declan? I haven't even implied it!


You were lobbing things my way yesterday which I took time to reply but you ignored me (fireworks thread)


I genuinely have no idea what your beef is with me


My quote (from someone lots of people haven;t heard of, but don't let that stop you looking him up - he's ace. I've seen him at least 3 times in venues in East Dulwich. So not that obscure)... but my quote was meant to indicate I agreed with Quids point in general - but because of the state we are in we can't have that level of debate yet


What IS your problem with me ?? How was my post parish priestish?

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> eh? When did I say you were offensive Declan? I

> haven't even implied it!

>

> You were lobbing things my way yesterday which I

> took time to reply but you ignored me (fireworks

> thread)

>

> I genuinely have no idea what your beef is with

> me

>

> My quote (from someone lots of people haven;t

> heard of, but don't let that stop you looking him

> up - he's ace. I've seen him at least 3 times in

> venues in East Dulwich. So not that obscure)...

> but my quote was meant to indicate I agreed with

> Quids point in general - but because of the state

> we are in we can't have that level of debate yet

>

> What IS your problem with me ?? How was my post

> parish priestish?


You never said I was offensive Sean as far as I know.I put that in to try and avoid any future offence. Obviously didn't work. What's this about me lobbing stuff at you in the fireworks thread. What thread? I'm getting old and the memory is letting me down so please be specific. Thanks.

dulwichmum

dulwichmum

Posted
Posted

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwichmum may have potential, but as she reaches

> free-bus pass age tomorrow; she is no Britney.


HOW VERY DARE YOU!


I see myself as more of an upmarked version of Sophie Ellis-Bexter, with the looks of a young Kristen Scott Thomas. Britney is not for everyone...


 

mockney piers

mockney piers

Posted
Posted

Bottom line is both posters repeatedly transgressed the TOU of this place.

Both were repeatedly warned, both were repeated offenders.

Both are banned.


TLS alleged racism is neither here nor there nor ever a part of his ban.


I too am uncomfortable with the bandying about of accusations and the inability of those concerned to defend themselves, but HAL's assertion that BBW's posts were the equivalent of a disorder that needs attention and sympathy almost made me spit my coffee on to the keyboard. Wolfie would be the first to say 'i am what i am, i stand by what i say and I accept the consequences' for that I rather admire him, certainly more than many who post on here, but allow him back? Not until I see a change (though not my call obviously).


There has been much accusation of the illuminati, stepford, lizard variety that unwelcome views are suppressed, yet those all seem to revel in voices that are antisocial and 'controversial' regardless of the often poisonous reactions they engender and the deep upset they cause.


This thread excepted, I for one am glad the lounge is a quieter place. The forum's recent absence and my willingness to wander back to places like Thisislondon or other fora where entrenched anger ridden slanging somehow qualifies for debate makes me even happier to welcome back the EDF's return. Long may it continue to be a refuge of the ludicrously bonkers yet sane.


Admin took a decision for the good of the forum, tough decisions but I'm happy to back Admin for that.


For those who feel the place is poorer for their removal, and they are entitled to that opinion, there are other fora where they still have a voice.


Go, enjoy.

TillieTrotter

TillieTrotter

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A solution is letting it all come out and be

> exposed philisophically and eugenically as the

> idoicy it is but accepting that us, flawed human

> beings, do have prejudices, have tendancies to be

> scared of the unknown and the 'different' that we

> should try and overcome. But currently I'm

> completley despondent about that in general and as

> this thread and forum have demonstrated humans



Word.

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

Racism is not always black and white (worst pun of the week award). There is a whole spectrum of beliefs and attitudes out there... and although his views often left a bitter taste in the mouth, neither was he the most offensive person I am ever likely to encounter. Pigeonholing him as an out-and-out racist is not necessarily accurate or fair.


I don't think he is a particularly rare breed. In fact, he probably speaks for a much greater proportion of the community than a lot of us here would like to acknowledge. He quite possibly mixes in social circles where they regularly bemoan the demise of traditional English society, and where immigration is blamed for many of the country's problems. Such people undoubtedly do not consider themselves to be racist... but Tony is quite obviously coming from a totally different frame of reference than most of us. Sometimes discussing these things (as tricky as it was sometimes with Tony) is more constructive than accusations of racism.

HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

If we're going to start forming into clicks on here, can I just say that I think all the cats on here are for the most part lollygaggers and yeggs, but the chicks are all straight from the fridge and ginchy.

Can't say fairer or hepper than that.

woofmarkthedog

woofmarkthedog

Posted
Posted

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well you know how it switchblades, B, sometimes a

> cat has to get tufty.


______________________________________________________


Exactly how many packets of "Rowntree's Randoms" have you had H ?



W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Noticeboard on Northcross Road

      By Sue · Posted

      Thank you, Pugwash. That's really useful information. Do you know who was responsible for the locks and keys, or which council department? Could you PM me if you don't want to put someone's personal details on here?  It may save me having to speak to Monica. Thanks.
    • Sue
      ED Nature Watch

      By Sue · Posted

      Does anybody know why? Trees aren't cut down for no reason. There must have been something wrong with it (I hope that was the reason). A child was recently killed and another one injured when a tree fell in a park (not in this area). It isn't always obvious from the outside when a tree is diseased or whatever, and I imagine the council would give safety considerations priority when deciding what to do, if there was any doubt at all.
    • Han92-ED
      ED Nature Watch

      By Han92-ED · Posted

      It looks like they have cut it down completely now 😭
    • Sue
      Yet another burst main... major leak on Lordship Lane nr junction with Barry Rd

      By Sue · Posted

      Different people will be  involved within Thames Water. The people dealing with the leaks aren't the people encouraging less water usage. How many people have reported the Barry Road leak? By what channels? What response have they had? When we had a leak in our road which meant we had no water, several people reported it, there was good communication with TW, they explained why they couldn't come out immediately (other urgent jobs elsewhere in the area) , kept  in touch with us and fixed the leak within a reasonable timescale (hours). Someone from TW also contacted me later to make sure my water was back. But does Thames Water know about it? They aren't psychic (I presume). If nobody reports it, I also presume they won't even know the leaks are  there, unless they have some kind of central monitoring system which tells them when there are leaks in the system. To make it clear, I am not defending Thames Water as a company, which I think should never have been privatised.  But there are some things they can't be blamed for (old and disintegrating water pipe system in London) and some they can (possibly, lack of sufficient staff to deal with leaks, maybe due to trying to save money to give their shareholders more. But this is just surmise on my part - I know nothing about Thames Water).

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...