Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why? Because he makes me a laugh and always tries to be diplomatic. I realise that this forum is for people to express their views and opinions, but I do think that some times it can get a bit personal.


Keef will then suddenly appear with a light-hearted joke and a sensible resolution to any disputes. Brilliant!


Oh, and he supports the mighty LFC >:D<


Edited for Keef :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/873-who-is-your-favourite-forumite/
Share on other sites

Dangerous thread - could become a right luvvie-fest


I'll name a couple of people who have kept me interested (there are others as well - hope they are not offended by not being named)


Michael Palaeologus (in his various incarnations) who was a prime mover in keeping this place more interesting than an online version of the South London Press

Dulwichmum - obvious reasons

Mockney Piers - for often making me think I posted my thoughs more articulately than I normally do (only to find it was he who made the post)

Administrator - for his single-mindedness in finding lounge material

Keef - for the reasons stated


Those are the old school posters - plenty of interesting posters joined of late. Bellendelle Belle & asset, to name but two

andyng wrote:


"Where exactly is Herne Hill,is it next door to East Dulwich?

I was told ... that it was easier to travel from

Barbican to Herne Hill,then to East Dulwich.


Also is Dulwich Village West Dulwich and do they have a train station of there own?

...Isnt Tulse Hill next door to West Dulwich?"


Pure class


citizen

Always fond of a luvvie fest...

Snorky often makes me chuckle - I like a maverick.

Sean MacGabhann always makes the effort to contribute to threads - a friendly, thoughtful voice always (oh and a Rufus Wainwright fan to boot).

Dulwich Mum of course - our very own mascot

And far too many names which crop up, making me smile, think, and wish I didn't have to get back to work.

Oh cool, I'll keep an eye out, just had to give up on large chunks of the 1500+ posts I've missed this week.

And cheers for the nod too Sean, thoroughly enjoy your contribution too.


And while we're all on a snorky love-fest, I have to say that I've grown quite fond myself.

And I have to go Polly D for making me want to say 'word' and then chuckle all the time (and for being jolly nice)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...