Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I personally would like to see Capital Punishment reintroduced as there is no significant detterant avaliabile now that might stop someone commiting murder, and i don't want to see my taxes go towards keeping these people alive and in jail.

Before all the cry babies start i will state some facts.

Britain effectively abolished capital punishment in 1965, the rate of murders in 1964 were 0.68 per 100,00 of the population now they are about 1.42 per 100,000 of the population a more than double rise.

Home office figures show unlawfull killings were 300 in 1964, 833 in 2004 and 734 in 2007.

Statistics kept by the Home office for the 5 year period between 1964 and 1969 show a 125% rise in murders that would have attracted a death sentance.

Okay.

Goverment analysis of the criminal situation between 1900 and the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939 points to the death penalty being a detterant to commiting criminal murders but not domestic murders,a criminal thinking of a planned robbery would think and plan ahead to avoid the consequences of murder, where as in domestic murder it would usually be non planned and happen in the heat of the moment.

The most compelling argument against capital punishment is of course the fact that innocent people may be executed, however i think execution would be appropiate when the evidence against the individual is so compelling and compact that there is no chance the accused is actually innocent and with the use of dna now days it would be certainly easier to prove innocence or guilt.

A 2005 survey(not to sure who they are) found that out of 1118 respondants 2/3 of thenm wanted the death penatly brought back, unfortunately due to our membership of the Eu and our commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights we are held back by those other people so politically it would be hard to reintroduce.

All the money wasted on keeping people inside for murders could be used for other more important social projects,sadly its seems that we will have to accept the high level of crimes and murders till a time arises when the people have had enough and force the goverment to implement the changes.

Here's that Panama again, getting us all riled up about an effective deterrent to ensuring no one ever commits murder.

'Pon my Sam, I'll swing for him so I will.

Actually I won't really, Pan so don't worry, even if you ever get to a political position where you might enact legislation that would reintroduce capital punishment, it's hardly likely I'll ever be in the dock accused of yours or anyone else's murder.

So, as you were.

But overall, a rotten stinking idea. Murder is wrong, judicial murder is no better.

Personal vengeance...now that's a different matter.

panama Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> with the use of dna now days it would be certainly

> easier to prove innocence or guilt.


Wonderful stuff that DNA. There's enough in a discarded cigarette butt, a wad of chewing gum, a used tissue or even the rim of a glass someone has drunk from to place them at the scene of any crime - with a little malicious aforethought.

panama Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I personally would like to see Capital Punishment

> reintroduced as there is no significant detterant

> avaliabile now that might stop someone commiting

> murder, and i don't want to see my taxes go

> towards keeping these people alive and in jail.

> Before all the cry babies start i will state some

> facts.

> Britain effectively abolished capital punishment

> in 1965, the rate of murders in 1964 were 0.68 per

> 100,00 of the population now they are about 1.42

> per 100,000 of the population a more than double

> rise.

> Home office figures show unlawfull killings were

> 300 in 1964, 833 in 2004 and 734 in 2007.

> Statistics kept by the Home office for the 5 year

> period between 1964 and 1969 show a 125% rise in

> murders that would have attracted a death

> sentance.

> Okay.

> Goverment analysis of the criminal situation

> between 1900 and the outbreak of the Second World

> War in 1939 points to the death penalty being a

> detterant to commiting criminal murders but not

> domestic murders,a criminal thinking of a planned

> robbery would think and plan ahead to avoid the

> consequences of murder, where as in domestic

> murder it would usually be non planned and happen

> in the heat of the moment.

> The most compelling argument against capital

> punishment is of course the fact that innocent

> people may be executed, however i think execution

> would be appropiate when the evidence against the

> individual is so compelling and compact that there

> is no chance the accused is actually innocent and

> with the use of dna now days it would be certainly

> easier to prove innocence or guilt.

> A 2005 survey(not to sure who they are) found that

> out of 1118 respondants 2/3 of thenm wanted the

> death penatly brought back, unfortunately due to

> our membership of the Eu and our commitment to the

> European Convention on Human Rights we are held

> back by those other people so politically it would

> be hard to reintroduce.

> All the money wasted on keeping people inside for

> murders could be used for other more important

> social projects,sadly its seems that we will have

> to accept the high level of crimes and murders

> till a time arises when the people have had enough

> and force the goverment to implement the changes.



What is the penalty for murdering the English language?

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> What is the penalty for murdering the English

> language?


CAPITAL punishment is the only way surely.

Anyone found guilty of maliciously with malice aforethought and prior knowledge before the fact knowingly assaulting a paragragh should be sentenced to deth.

Taken from this plaice and well, hung.

It'd save the burden on the syntax payers.

Santerme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> What is the penalty for murdering the English

> language?


Do you mean murder in same the same way as I could murder a curry right now or in the same way as the last 8 miles of traffic were murder?

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our 10 month old kitten has been missing since this morning from Nutbrook street. I know that's  not that long but he's not well and on medication for diarrhea, vomiting, and eating very little. He only ever goes out back and today he got out the front door, an area he's never been before. He's very good about coming home when you call him but no sign.  Answers to Jeffrey or Jeff.  Please get in touch in you see him as I think he will be very dehydrated very soon. 
    • A Google search brought up eleven Chango  branches, although they don't all seem to be listed on their website. In the order they came up: East Dulwich, Clapham Common, Mayfair, Wandsworth, City of London, Wimbledon,  Parsons Green, Kensington, Highgate, Richmond, Hampstead. I think it is the positioning of this new branch that has mostly got to me. I accept that they would have to go for where a space became vacant, but Lordship Lane is pretty long, even just the part with shops in,  and choosing to  open a stone's throw away from Chacarero seems mean, to say the least. I wonder if they have made contact with Chacarero. It would be nice to think they had (in a friendly way, obviously!) As regards the apparent  marketing spiel, at least one of the online reviewers also refers to a Chango branch (the Parsons Green one in this case) as a "gem". Probably just coincidence and a word in common use to describe such places. I wouldn't know. I'm ancient 🤣
    • I like empanadas. I don't think Chango is a massive chain - it's got a few stores all in London I believe (stand to be corrected if I've got that wrong). I don't see a problem with them opening on the Lane personally. I really like Chacarero, but that doesn't mean that they should be immune from competition - if they're successful and open a couple more stores, are we then meant to stop supporting them for being a 'chain'?  That opening post does sound a lot like marketing spiel though. Is the OP perhaps connected to the new business I wonder?
    • According to what I can see online, Dynamic Vines and Cave de Bruno sell totally different kinds of wine to each other.  Dynamic Vines  "work with independent winemakers who produce outstanding wine using sustainable practices in the vineyard and minimal intervention in the cellar".  Cave de Bruno specialises in French wines and spirits from small independent producers. So two different USPs, and no doubt two different but overlapping customer bases who can afford these wines. Probably different again to the people mainly  shopping for wine at Majestic or the Co op. On the other hand, the two empanada shops appear on the face of it to be selling virtually identical products. But time will tell, won't it? Let's see how they are both doing in - say - a couple of years' time. Impossible, of course, to compare that with how they would have done if there had been only one of them. I just feel more  sorry for the original one than for  the one which can apparently already afford to have a number of shops in places like Mayfair and Highgate. I'm tempted to buy something there every week, and I don't even like that kind of pastry 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...