Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think she had to go and find a golf club to

> free him from his car?

>

> Or, er, do you think she, like, sort-of already

> had it in her hands as he, you know, ran out of

> the house and tried to escape at high speed?

>

> (giggle)


______________________________________________________


She staged the "crash" apparently after whacking him senseless with a "Wood"


She was seen dragging his body to the "crash site" by concerned neighbors



It's true....

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8870-tiger-woods/#findComment-269964
Share on other sites

Even men are now calling up to say that they have had sex with Tiger Woods. This is one example - just listen to this commentator towards the end of this clip, he's having some of tiger for sure.

(For non golfers 1min20secs is the relevant part - "Here it comes...oh my goodness.....oh whaaoooo")



 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8870-tiger-woods/#findComment-274044
Share on other sites

He is pompous and arrogant and if he makes a mistake using the driver he always curses the photographers as if they have put him off his swing.




I think he married a viking not a Swede, she seems more than ready to fight her corner, and when the divorce comes she will no doubt be looking for large quantities of 'Danegeld'.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8870-tiger-woods/#findComment-274052
Share on other sites

huncamunca Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I seem to have stumbled upon an online UK version

> of the National Enquirer

>

> Coming up next, Britney Spears drives to shops

> without make up exclusive


But was she wearing any knickers? That's the question everyone's really asking.





Right?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8870-tiger-woods/#findComment-274148
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...