Christmas Trees...
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
I'd have guessed a lot of these transactions are people sending funds overseas to support family in poorer countries and you think they should be taxed on that. so you want to see hard working possibly disadvantaged people double taxed? That is utterly nuts. And perhaps just to reiterate what I stated earlier, if people are taking money overseas, it is to keep thieving Reeves fingers well away from their hard earned £.
-
On appealing, I've had the same reply regarding my personal membership, despite being told previously by staff that I could apply for a (partial) refund when the pool finally reopens (it still isn't open) and to go ahead and use the gym instead in the meantime. I've made a formal complaint. Any local journalists on here? Perhaps local councillors are following this thread?
-
You got my point exactly. Sending money out of the country is disinvestment. Successive government's here make a big noise about incoming investment by foreign businesses. but keep quiet about the outflow of £28.5 Bn annually by remittances. I can't recall any recent inflows matching that amount. No wonder the country is getting poorer by the day.
-
By David Peckham · Posted
If that £28 billion was spent on, I don't know, Guinness in the EDT, it would raise cash through VAT and alcohol duty. If it was invested, say in Diageo (the parent company of Guinness), those dividends would be subject to CGT. I have no wish to pay more tax, but it seems like a significant loophole, and one that wouldn't affect me, so I'm in favour of it.
-
East Dulwich Forum
Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now