Jump to content

Kitten for FREE


Caroakes

Recommended Posts

Hi all!


My husband and I are looking for a kitten. We already know about Celia Hammond and other rescue centres, but there's always a fee. We're just looking for a free kitten to go to a very loving home. We keep looking on gumtree too, but not only the kittens are to buy, the prices are just simply ridiculous...

Anyone knows someone who's giving kittens away for free?


Thank you


Caroline

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92629-kitten-for-free/
Share on other sites

I hope you realise that when you own an animal that they will still cost you in vet fees and basic care so if you are not willing to make a donation to an animal charity maybe you shouldn't really take on a pet . Also if you had a kitten from Celia Hammond your kitten would be neutered already and vaccinated, which as a responsible pet owner you would need to get done .

I have already owned pets before thank you very much, so I know what it costs to take a new member of the family onboard.


Thank you for what I will take as real concern, rather than just a nasty/angry message...


ps: I consider neutering not "responsible", but actually cruel. FYI, we don't all have to think the same way.


REAL help wanted please :)

  • 10 months later...

I agree with Broadbean.


Paying for an animal - particularly to a charity - shows a committment and awareness of responsibilities going forward.


Worried by the hostility from the searcher.


I would - as is always stated on this forum - advise you to search for pets through rehoming centers and not give animals away fro free.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
    • Dog kennel isn't a great name for a school. I agree that it's ridiculous for the name to put anyone off going there, but don't see any issue with them rebranding if the parents and children prefer a new name. The school is surrounded by historical 'groves' (reflected in the names of Camberwell Grove, Grove park and Grove Vale for example), so it's not a totally random name. 
    • It might help if there are body cams to record evidence and a presence maybe a deterrent but I very much doubt a park warden would intervene with obnoxious and violent thugs - children or not. We need police for that.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...