Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've received a PCN from TfL - the car vaguely looks like ours in the photo, but I can't see the registration plates (which, along with most of the car, are obscured by the van in front). As this incident was over a year ago (long, boring story, including multiple screw ups by TfL just to get to the stage where the PCN is finally re-issued to the correct address) - I can't remember if one of us was driving then and there.


Should I just pay up and forget about it? I feel like I should ask for further evidence that it was our car, but is this likely to lead to some kind of resolution or will they just say the plates were observed without providing further photos?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/
Share on other sites

Well yeah, that's the crux - how did they? Can they provide the evidence? Do they have to? Do they store the footage? Did a camera operator write down the plate numbers and take two obscure photos? Is the operator's word/note enough?


To be honest, it's a route we use, the 20-25% of the car that's visible looks like ours, so ordinarily I'd just pay, but given the rigmarole I've been through with this nonsense and what shoddy customer service I've received, I'm minded to be bloody minded. For context, I've never challenged a fine, and I can't remember the last time prior to this I was fined for a driving offense.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/#findComment-957179
Share on other sites

Timeline (heavily redacted for avoidance of boredom induced thunks of head on keyboard) is something like: Move house end of 2014 -> notify DVLA of address move -> PCN incident occurs Jan 2015 -> PCN sent to old house (+ escalations) -> get bailiff letter at new house Sep 2015-> freak out, send Statutory declaration Sep 2015 -> finally get re-issued PCN 2 days ago.


Appeal to whom - do you mean to "make a representation" as per the TfL parlance?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/#findComment-957319
Share on other sites

It sounds like the time issue won't be a valid grounds of appeal for you, given your statutory declaration. You may have more luck with lack of evidence given the pictures you describe, though you need to check the re-issued PCN to see if you are still allowed to appeal. It may be that this is not an option given what has gone on before.


AFAIK, you have to appeal to TFL first, get turned down (as you will), then take it to the London Tribunals. I understand you can ask to view all the pictures, but you have to go into TFL offices in person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/#findComment-957349
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was normal cyclists, in rush hour traffic, in the dark, in the rain. Just really want people to realise it’s that time of year even more careful and to get kitted out.
    • The other consideration is that users of Lime bikes and similar, plus younger pedal cyclists, probably don't view themselves as 'cyclists' as such and so don't get kitted out or even consider that they need to. I also agree that earlier nights are another factor for the casual or hire bike user more used to cycling in the summer. I don't think I have ever seen a hire bike or scooter user wearing a helmet or reflective gear- presumably that is because the bike is just viewed as a transport tool for short term use and users do not want to be encumbered by any of the safety gear? Before anyone jumps on me for anecdotal evidence and speculation, this is just what I have seen round here, there may be hordes of similar users elsewhere that are kitted out.
    • Well apolitical if that is an OK word for you.  Sorry if my choice of words was incorrect.  But on my original point if it wasn't for the Telegraph dragging this up, and yes they do have an agenda, an no they are not apolitical/impartial whatever, we;d be none the wiser. But as it made no difference to Trump's election campaign that why would he have a case in the American courts? Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of the programme
    • If she took a bus, has she tried contacting the bus company? Long shot, but you never know!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...