Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've received a PCN from TfL - the car vaguely looks like ours in the photo, but I can't see the registration plates (which, along with most of the car, are obscured by the van in front). As this incident was over a year ago (long, boring story, including multiple screw ups by TfL just to get to the stage where the PCN is finally re-issued to the correct address) - I can't remember if one of us was driving then and there.


Should I just pay up and forget about it? I feel like I should ask for further evidence that it was our car, but is this likely to lead to some kind of resolution or will they just say the plates were observed without providing further photos?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/
Share on other sites

Well yeah, that's the crux - how did they? Can they provide the evidence? Do they have to? Do they store the footage? Did a camera operator write down the plate numbers and take two obscure photos? Is the operator's word/note enough?


To be honest, it's a route we use, the 20-25% of the car that's visible looks like ours, so ordinarily I'd just pay, but given the rigmarole I've been through with this nonsense and what shoddy customer service I've received, I'm minded to be bloody minded. For context, I've never challenged a fine, and I can't remember the last time prior to this I was fined for a driving offense.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/#findComment-957179
Share on other sites

Timeline (heavily redacted for avoidance of boredom induced thunks of head on keyboard) is something like: Move house end of 2014 -> notify DVLA of address move -> PCN incident occurs Jan 2015 -> PCN sent to old house (+ escalations) -> get bailiff letter at new house Sep 2015-> freak out, send Statutory declaration Sep 2015 -> finally get re-issued PCN 2 days ago.


Appeal to whom - do you mean to "make a representation" as per the TfL parlance?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/#findComment-957319
Share on other sites

It sounds like the time issue won't be a valid grounds of appeal for you, given your statutory declaration. You may have more luck with lack of evidence given the pictures you describe, though you need to check the re-issued PCN to see if you are still allowed to appeal. It may be that this is not an option given what has gone on before.


AFAIK, you have to appeal to TFL first, get turned down (as you will), then take it to the London Tribunals. I understand you can ask to view all the pictures, but you have to go into TFL offices in person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/92847-pcn/#findComment-957349
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought the building was connected to the mosque in some way. If it is owned by someone else, then I apologise for making assumptions. It doesn't look to me like the awning is falling off? It's hanging quite crookedly, but it seems to be attached at both sides? But that photo must have been taking some time ago, judging by the skip and its contents, so maybe the situation has changed?
    • Never. Never. Never again. Had a really awful experience with them caused by the owner.
    • And that fair funding review is crucial if we are ever going to tackle the divide between London, and regions that have been in extended decline for some time. London has its fair share of deprivation - 1 in 25 according to data (the Southeast of the country is 1in 33) but has many avenues to money from wealth, higher band Council Tax revenue, etc. Go to say, the Northwest or North East, and deprivation there is 1 in 5. Councils struggle to just stay on top of essential services, which face higher demand proportionally because of that higher deprivation. That is why there needs to be some adjustment in funding, addressing need vs purely population size. So McAsh's objection to this make no sense for someone who was a member of the Labour Party and a Union activist.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...