Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tracymcdavis Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> But not yet clear if all

> > killings around the UK are same person of course

> -

> > heaven forbid there is more than one of these

> > monsters out there.

>

>

> Unfortunately all the publicity is likely to have

> resulted in copy-cat (sorry can't think of a more

> appropriate word) killings by people who were that

> way inclined in the first place :(

>

> I can't believe just one person would travel

> around the country killing cats. Unless they were

> already travelling, for example for work purposes.



SNARL have stated that it is likely the cat killer travels for work. They have also indicated that certain forensic details are intentionally being withheld, so that copycats can be excluded.


The recent arrest unfortunately does not seem to be the serial killer, just a random sicko. :(

natty01295 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sky News;

>

> Police arrest man after five cats killed in

> Northampton

>

> https://news.sky.com/story/police-arrest-man-after

> -five-cats-killed-in-northampton-11197847


This is basically the same info as the BBC article above, and unfortunately this does not currently appear to be directly linked to the serial cat killer. :(


Obviously it's good if an abuser has been caught, but as a killer is still purportedly at large, please stay vigilant. xx

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 5 weeks later...
I hope it doesn't mean he's in the area - keep a look out everyone. The description was "he is said to be a white man in his 40s with short brown hair, dressed in dark clothing, possibly with acne scarring to his face. It also says he may be wearing a headlamp or carrying a torch."

I walk my dog in the evening when it is dark. My dog seems to notice all cats/foxes on our walk. I am amazed at how many people leave their cats out at night. Not a cat owner myself but have been aware of these hideous attacks for a long time now.


For goodness sake please bring in your cats, guinea pigs and rabbits. Don't put them in danger, they are precious and rely on their owners to protect them.

Purple Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I walk my dog in the evening when it is dark. My

> dog seems to notice all cats/foxes on our walk. I

> am amazed at how many people leave their cats out

> at night. Not a cat owner myself but have been

> aware of these hideous attacks for a long time

> now.

>

> For goodness sake please bring in your cats,

> guinea pigs and rabbits. Don't put them in

> danger, they are precious and rely on their owners

> to protect them.


Couldn't agree more Purple, all my cats rabbits birds in, I can't understand how the owners sleep at night, guess because it's not escalated to people being mulilated yet. I Like you Purple, a good sensible person.

  • 1 month later...
James, I have sent you SNARL?s response to the article via FB. Unless cars and foxes have learnt to undo bolted cages, kill their inhabitants and then bolt them shut, you will see that there is a sick person out there doing unmentionable things to people?s pets.
James Barber please follow the SNARL website. I?m at a loss to understand why you would actually have faith in this New Scientist tosh. Since when have foxes become so intelligent they carry knives with them, have the ability to use those knives and dismember other creatures. Also why the hell would a superhuman fox have the ability to place a dismembered cat/rabbit/guinea pig etc.in a specific arrangement so as to cause distress to its owners. I really hope that I have read your wording wrong. If so, I apologise. If not, I will not be allowed to post my response.
Has anyone actually read the New Scientist article (apart from James) - seeing as it requires a subscription (which I don't have)? Have you got a subscription to New Scientist Toffee, and have you read the article? If not why are you shrieking heretic at him and calling the article "tosh" without even knowing what it says?
I haven?t read the whole article but if you would care to get off your high horse for once and listen to others opinions, you may see that I have referred to SNARL. No I don?t have a subscription to the New Scientist. do you follow the SNARL website? Have you ever heard of how many family pets have been mutilated. By the way, I assume you have read the article in the new scientist word for word otherwise you wouldn?t be posting your usual pompous opinion. Hold on a minute...you say you don?t have a subscription to it, so how the hell do you know it?s content. You just can?t help yourself from putting me down can you?

Toffee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven?t read the whole article but if you would

> care to get off your high horse for once and

> listen to others opinions, you may see that I have

> referred to SNARL. No I don?t have a subscription

> to the New Scientist. do you follow the SNARL

> website? Have you ever heard of how many family

> pets have been mutilated. By the way, I assume you

> have read the article in the new scientist word

> for word otherwise you wouldn?t be posting your

> usual pompous opinion. Hold on a minute...you say

> you don?t have a subscription to it, so how the

> hell do you know it?s content. You just can?t help

> yourself from putting me down can you?


Yes, I actually said I hadn't read the article, and clearly neither have you. Unlike you, I'm not making assumptions about something I haven't read. I've read SNARL's response but it really isn't a detailed rebuttal at all, it seems to represent the same hysteria that you do that any suggestion there may be an alternative explanation for any of these cases is utter heresy, even though respected organizations such as the RSPCA have suggested the same.


As for not being able to help putting you down, no I really can't help it as it's impossible to respond to any of your comments without putting you down as they're mostly ludicrous. I look forward to you calling me out for a fight again like before.

Just to clarify in general. This is by no means a pop at Rendell Harris. My at is 3 years old. I love him dearly. When I first heard that cats and other animals were being mutilatedin this barbaric why I was mortified. I cannot understand why a human being or beings could bring themselves to do such a thing. There have been many theories over this. But one thingI do know is that the police are very heavily involved in this under the name of operation Takahe. The RSPCA are involved and they too are taking this very seriously. When articles are posted in whatever form. Yes it?s good toreadthem. But I?m sorry,a fox with a knife who has the intelligence to cut another animal precisely, and even remove its inward sand place those inwards on its owners doorstep. Tokilla cat, remove its head. Tail and legs and then place the cats collar on its owners Doorstep. Sorry it?s bad reading.Foxes donotdo this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...