Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, who will fill Jonathon's slot?


Graham Norton? And there's his opening line.


Pennie Smith? With just the right amount of Shiraz, she could put on a fierce show.


Tim Wonnacott? Antique maven, TV presenter, amateur historian, dilettante and I reckon chocolatier. Wouldn't know who most of his guests were but would have enough wit and charm to get around such a trifle.


Ricky Gervais? The first series and a half would be the usual rounds of promotional duties with him getting more cheesed off with playing the game. Midway into series two Gervais would ban every guest from promoting whatever they were currently involved in and have a conversation about whatagwan and etcetera.

He'd carry on for twelve or thirteen episodes and then sack it of course, but it'd be crically acclaimed.


And then he could pass the baton to AA Gill, I reckon he'd be poncey-good telly, myself.

It's up to you, Al.


If you want to plod your way towards The Crem in a 'tolerable' profession, pausing only occasionally to wistfully imagine how things might have been if you'd have had the bottle to try and make a living out of something you actually enjoyed - then that's your call.



Or did you try, goddamit - only for Lady Luck to shat in your lap?

Where are my manners! Let's catch-up properly.


Was the neighbour / wall rendering issue resolved, or are you 'at war'?

Did your 'friend' ever make that fresh start abroad, or did you - I mean he - wuss-out?

Did Selbourne Village weather the financial storm?

How do you walk around looking like a literary genius? I presume that anyone who may be a literary genius requires others to declare it so. I'm a literary genious...........but no one knows. Feck the begrudgers I say.


Edited to correct a spelling mistake......that's not a compliment from Mr.Lush underneath.......it's a correction.

Have just watched Film 2010 and found Jonathan Ross completely engaging - I think he is a big loss to the Beeb.


Those who complain about the cost of the licence fee will see no reduction after he leaves so will see no saving. But if he goes to Sky we will pass a prime asset to Murdoch. Those who can afford ?40 a month will see him and those who cannot will be deprived.


I'm all in favour of the Beeb using our money to get the best - so that we can ALL see the best.

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> That said, if you fail to recognise this you can

> be fooled in to giving ?6m of public money to

> Jonathon Ross when you might as well have got a

> middle of the road blogging 'funny' man like *Bob*

> to do it as a hobby..


___________________________________________________________


For Fucking hell sake


Oh so blinking clever, hissing at each other on some marginal forum for gods sake


Ok first set aside the money & your silly egos.


Now look at JR, the guests & the general entertainment, the whole bloody picture in fact.

Week on week JR delivered, he did it.

You might not like it because you think he's a talentless pratt, if that's the case then why isn't it you on there ? because you are a talentless pratt too ...Yes ?


Of course he's a better pratt than you, only he reminds you of how talentless you really are & that you are still a pratt achieving "relatively" nothing.


This is little to do with JR or Chris Evans or whoever you turn your spite to. The bottom line is, your own high opinion of yourself is held only by you, under achiever, because that's your talent. Though as much as you seethe, no one but no-one can hate you more than you hate yourself


Oh & now add the money ?6 million is it ?....well make that ?6 trillion


"Coz you're worthless"



Funnily I don't see a line snaking round the "beeb" to take over "THE JOB"


Have you applied ?



No thought not, so move on "The Audience" is bored




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...