Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Indeed it looks like a long way off being a done deal thank goodness.


Mind you if it carries on with tabloid trash like http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/basshunter-too-clingy-says-big-brother-housemate-katia-1864368.html then I might have to consider boycotting it regardless.


For a paper that said it wouldn't even do royal reporting, how low is schleb big brother reporting sinking?!?

When this monumental event happens the amount of seizures and strokes in East Dulwich is going to hit an all time high.


Lets be honest most news papers are now crap as they have all sacked so many staff and pick up most of their news via google and the AP.


The only papers worth reading are the FT and Evening Standard for gossip, although now I read far more on-line that I do IRL.


I wonder how many people he will offend with his first op ed, its bound to be sexist racist and homophobic.

Unfortunately with the Newspaper industry currently in a seemingly terminal nosedive directly linked to reduced income, the only recourse left to the qualities is to appeal to a broader readershit(heh, typo?)in the hope of riding out the storm. I indulge in an Observer on a Sunday if its got that Food supplement thingy & usually hide a copy of Razzle deep within its pages.

I had a bit of a chat with him down the CPT once. He's actually a nice enough bloke, we talked about his trip to Israel and Palestine and the thoughtful docementary he made.

His column however is rubbish and yes I think he does do it on purpose.

Mind you I can't stand Julie Burchill's writing either, but I have a feeling she'd be a terrible erstwhile drinking companion down the pub.

In all reality, on the whole all he's guilty of is spending too much time on one of the more traditionally supported footbal teams' forums and baiting Guardinitsas online by challemging orthodox liberal views...ain't so bad way to behave ;-).


Good piece on this in yesterday's Observer (which I accidentally bought instead of the NOTW) which concluded the freedom of speech the middleclass parts of internet is 'free' as long as you tow the liberal line...if you don't as a journalist/public face they'll be massive twitter/facebook campaigns launched against you...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...