Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the latest Friday Cities newsletter (from the ex-The Friday Thing people) raises a contentious issue about our borough:


WHICH BOROUGH HAS THE BEST LOOKING INHABITANTS?


Out in East Dulwich last night, it struck me that, overall, East

Dulwich does not appear to sport a particularly good-looking

populace. Not as bad as Nunhead, obviously. But there is a grimy,

potatoey sheen to most of the people you see on the streets of

SE22. Now, I?m no Adonis myself. But there?s no doubt the

inhabitants of some other areas of town are more consistently

pleasing to the eye. On the Kings Road or on Battersea Rise, for

example, the overall radiance of passer-bys ? male and female ? is

high. Islington, too, isn?t bad.


So is there a best looking borough? And why are some better than

others? Is it just wealth or youth?


- McCandelish




Join the conversation: http://tinyurl.com/33aatj

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/952-ugly-east-dulwich/
Share on other sites

How very dare he?


Actually, we are particularly radiant over here in West Dulwich. I myself am simply stunning - even without Botox (I am reliably informed that everyone else has it by the bucket), you simply could not buy cheek bones like mine.


Perhaps you in East Dulwich should drink more Evian?

Only for so long. After a while they'll find themselves crying out for a bit of genetic diversity.


(I wonder what the smallest practicable population for a suitably diverse gene pool might be... actually, no I don't. It's almost 10pm and just not the right time to start musing on such things.)

So a scotsman is acusing our local populace of a potatoey sheen.

If (s)he means we're a bit pale then they may have a point, but obviously irony is not their strong point.

Are they accusing us of being irish? poor choice of lingo old chap, and Mrs O'Mockney hates potatoes.

Are they accusing us of not being image obsessed, botox* injecting fuckwits?

Fine by me. Roll on the normal people of East Dulwich.


*no offence dulwichmum. I trust you won't get your ?70,000 white bikini bottoms in a twist ;)

No Mr Mockney,


Why should I be offended. I am Botox free although I am self obsessed it is true. You are gorgeous, Brendan is gorgeous, well all of the forumites I have met are gorgous - even Mr Batdog is gorgous as far as I am concerned - but I have not met him to confirm this. I am sure that this dreadful man was in fact talking about Brixton or Peckham or even Mitcham. The residents of Dulwich (North, West and East - why is there no South?) we are all honey's!

"Out in East Dulwich last night, it struck me that, overall, East

Dulwich does not appear to sport a particularly good-looking

populace. Not as bad as Nunhead, obviously. But there is a grimy,

potatoey sheen to most of the people you see on the streets of

SE22. Now, I?m no Adonis myself. But there?s no doubt the

inhabitants of some other areas of town are more consistently

pleasing to the eye. On the Kings Road or on Battersea Rise, for

example, the overall radiance of passer-bys ? male and female ? is

high. Islington, too, isn?t bad. "


How dare tyhese people offend your value system. l'll get to work in it right away.


Yes, generations of poor nutrition, hard work, low pay and unhealthy eating do take their toll- Dont worry though, Ill have a word with these troglodytic proles and ask them to move to Dagenham or somewhere they may be more at home, and you can sort out the migration of Beautiful people into the area.


Ethnic cleaning for ED.

Shaggy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God - has anyone here chekced out Whateley Road?

> Potatopeople-arama!



Oi, I grew you on Whateley Road, and I am not a spud!!! More of a runner bean me...


I usually see some lookers when I'm out and about.... That said, I'm usually rather drunk, so they could be complete mingers without the beer goggles :-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...