Jump to content

Recommended Posts

JBARBER wrote:- Do you mean the old timber yard?

If so the site was due to be cleared last week and building works on family homes started.



No mister Barber that site is on the corner of Underhill rd.

It has been mentioned that it was passed for five houses, but someone on this forum thought it had 'got the nod' for a centre for immigrants.

Does anyone know for sure what this site will be used for?

Well I hope it'll look good, that's all I can say. It just seems so sad to think of beautiful original victorian buidlings being wiped out. I live just off Upland Rd, close to where this is happening, but rarely visit Barry Rd unless I'm catching a bus, there I can see the work taking place. I don't know what it's looking like now...
I think its 8 2 bed flats at the front and 4 "mews" houses at the back all with parking spaces on site. planning permission was granted way back, and they waited ages before starting work. It is a great shame to see the old house demolished.
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
all I know is the houses in the development at the back have unbelievably steep roofs - well above what they asthetically should be - didn't get the planning permission that they thought they could push thro for loft rooms I believe (could be wrong so apologies if so) I really wonder if planners can actually read drawings sometimes - there are so many cases of bizarre permissions and equally bizarre refusals.
I have to say that I am surprised at how good the new builds actually look, I expected the usual modern towerblock style complex but they are actually quite tasteful and the windows looks really tasteful copies of original timber sash unlike the normal tacky PVC ones.
we were always told as a family by 95 year old grandmother that during the war an entire family were wiped out when a bomb was dropped on the site of the timber yard. and the site should never be built on?? bit of history there!! can anyone elaborate|???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I personally, just lost respect as this is not the time to.disrupt hospitals and put additional strain on stretched resources.  BBC News - Doctors vote to go ahead with this week's five-day strike https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c246dnyjylqo
    • Most people with pets would not bring either the pets or fireworks into their day to day conversations. Are you suggesting that only "timid" pets are scared by fireworks? What evidence do you have for that, exactly?  Or are you equating being scared of fireworks with being "timid"? Firework noise is not a noise that "comes with normal city living" ! What a very strange thing to say!
    • Well, I know a lot of people in London with pets and I've never heard any of them complain about fireworks.  Maybe what's not ok is keeping timid animals in a metropolis when they are scared of the noises that come with normal city living.
    • We git a ticket when we tried to park there to watch the fireworks.  Anyways we didn't even get a space and so we didn't actually park.  But we got a penalty notice.  We just paid up.  And we won't be taking our car their ever again.  You probably needed a Southwark council visitors permit.  I imagine it would have needed to be booked online B4 or by the end of the day that you parked. Beat thing to do is contact Southwark Council Estate parking to clarify the situation.   I hope your freebie was worth the value of your penalty.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...