Jump to content

Cyclist knocked off outside Harris Boys East Dulwich


taper

Recommended Posts

A cyclist was sent flying by a passenger door opening outside Harris Boys ED just after 8am this morning. Hats off the teachers and others outside the school who helped him. I hope you're OK if you happen to read this. If you need a witness, I was about 15metres behind you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea if it was the case in this instance but schools at dropping off time are very hairy places for cyclists as kids tend to erupt from cars on both sides without looking. It'd be very helpful if drivers could keep childproof locks/central locking on until they'd checked themselves, then let the kids out. Hope this rider's OK.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > People who do that should lose their licence

> > forever

>

> Could have been a rear seat passenger (without a

> licence) getting out the car.


I've seen this happen with black cabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long time ago when I chaired Southwark Cyclists TfL gave me stats showing in London 11% of cycling killed and seriously injured are from being 'doored'.

Cycle Training advice is to cycle further out to avoid this happening to you. Equally car occupants are duty bound to properly look to avoid taking people out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jimlad48 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > People who do that should lose their licence

> > forever

>

> Accidents happen. That seems a total overreaction

> to an unfortunate situation.


Jimlad, aside from the punishment, checking for cyclists is a "you MUST" in the Highway Code:


http://www.highwaycode.info/waiting-and-parking/waiting-and-parking-239


..so I think the blame is on the people in the car. And if the car's not obviously parked up to let people out, that makes it impossible for someone filtering past to anticipate a door opening. Dangerous stuff that should be more severely punished than it is, I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happened to me many years ago on the Old Kent Road. I went over the handlebars and car door and fortunately not under the travelling car that my bicycle then hit. That driver had no wing mirror, was stopped in a bus lane and didn't look properly. The driver of the other car, that was damaged by my bicycle, was furious with him and called the Police. In the end he was fined and given points.


Hope the young lad is ok and more importantly, is not put off from cycling as a result. It is the responsibility of the driver to make sure it is safe for passengers to exit their vehicle and hopefully a lesson has been learned there too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vast majority of drivers do all their loading kids and parcels on the street side doors. Why? Every day I see kids sent to load themselves through the street side door or parents loading babies into car seats from the street side door of the car. The complete illogic of this and the near universal fact leaves me incredulous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I load children. I NEVER load street side. I always load pavement side. This is a no brainer that 99 in 100 adults do not get and I am dumbfounded (while I appreciate that you and those 99 adults would just call me dumb. Go figure, which is why I bring it up. Please explain. Just move your car seat. Let the children scoot to the seat side. Lean in.) All those wide open doors into streets forcing wide manoeuvres. Wide open doors with butts poking way way out while adults carefully adjust safety straps and harnesses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, I don't call people dumb. Nor did I anywhere above. I expressed a perfectly reasonable point of view with which you are certainly free to disagree. I have an average sized saloon car and, with two car seats in place, there is no way for a child to exit the car on the opposing side without removing one of them. I don't admonish parents, most of whom are just trying to make it through the day as best they can. Until they make it possible to mount two carseats on the same side of a vehicle, I believe most of us will continue to do just that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> how is it an accident pray? Stupid driver intent

> on getting kid into school doesn't check mirrors

> etc.....NOT a bloody accident imvho



Are you suggesting the person in the car did this intentionally? Obviously I'm unaware of all the details but I'd be surprised if the door was opened on purpose in order to hurt the cyclist. It's true this sort of incident is easily preventable and deserves some punishment but losing their license is extreme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

walkman85 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > how is it an accident pray? Stupid driver

> intent

> > on getting kid into school doesn't check

> mirrors

> > etc.....NOT a bloody accident imvho

>

>

> Are you suggesting the person in the car did this

> intentionally? Obviously I'm unaware of all the

> details but I'd be surprised if the door was

> opened on purpose in order to hurt the cyclist.

> It's true this sort of incident is easily

> preventable and deserves some punishment but

> losing their license is extreme.


Totally agree - there are a tiny minority of drivers who do seem to delight in making cyclists lives a misery and they should be prosecured to the full extent of the law. BUT, these are very much the minority.


By all means ban drivers if it happens, but perhaps we could also introduce cycling licences and ban cyclists who do things like jumping red lights, riding on pavements or other dangerous behaviour that injures and kills pedestrians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was the cyclist "undertaking" ie. cycling past between the car and the pavement? My husband nearly had an incident with a cyclist who was doing just this - even though I was indicating left and had pulled in (I thought) very close to the pavement to drop him at the station.


I'm not victim blaming I hope but there are times when a passenger in a car might not think it was necessary to look behind them when opening the car door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm not victim blaming I hope but there are times

> when a passenger in a car might not think it was

> necessary to look behind them when opening the car

> door.


There's no time when anyone in a car shouldn't check behind them before opening a door! Whether a cyclist/motorcyclist or even pedestrian should or should not be there, they might be, err on the side of caution for your own sake (a friend had her wrist broken by a filtering motorcyclist ? insurance companies decided 50-50, she should have looked more closely, he shouldn't have gone so fast into a too narrow gap).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...