General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,360 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 139 replies
- 39.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 425 views
-
- 13 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 25 replies
- 8.5k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 230 views
-
- 42 replies
- 4.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 216 views
-
- 24 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 12 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 216 views
-
- 26 replies
- 4.2k views
-
- 141 replies
- 23.4k views
-
- 34 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 39 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 169 views
-
- 12 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 132 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
By James Barber · Posted
Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements. And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed. Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations? -
It's not very important in the great scheme of things, just a tiny piece of ED history! My OH will remember, having a less ancient brain than mine! -
I've got one you can borrow. I'll message you the details.
-