General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,299 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 939 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 511 views
-
- 92 replies
- 14.2k views
-
- 101 replies
- 12.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 32 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 116 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 26 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 38 replies
- 7.3k views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 30 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 233 views
-
- 0 replies
- 187 views
-
- 15 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.6k views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
If this is approved BT will probably apply to remove the phone box. These cost far more than they earn and are very vulnerable to vandelism. The old phone boxes are not ideal to become WiFi hubs, and will need the same level of engineering work to convert (they will be connected over copper). And they don't offer the advertising opportunity which pays for the free WiFi. -
By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted
They're big and ugly electronic advertising boards. There's a shagged out phone box across the road that could do the same thing! -
does seem to take up a width of the pavement that could be better used (i.e. we have to walk around it) and I'm not sure we need advertising on the pavements. Perhaps there are benefit's I don't know of. -
NIMBY - apparently
-