The Lounge
The place to relax and chat about anything.
22,630 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 433 views
-
- 36 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 17 replies
- 767 views
-
- 8 replies
- 766 views
-
- 194 replies
- 7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 451 views
-
- 20 replies
- 574 views
-
- 38 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 30 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 766 views
-
- 7 replies
- 576 views
-
- 13 replies
- 538 views
-
- 69 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 436 views
-
- 124 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 466 views
-
- 3 replies
- 409 views
-
- 8 replies
- 568 views
-
- 12 replies
- 760 views
-
- 18 replies
- 816 views
-
- 39 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 59 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 578 views
-
- 34 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 462 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By beansprout · Posted
Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood? -
A quick Google says that it is not undersubscribed unlike many subject schools so those claims mentioned above may not be true. Last Ofsted was good. You are definitely right about the money. This is what trusts do. Remove word ‘subject’ above Remove word ‘subject’ above I can’t edit my ridiculous errors but would like to apologise for messy post -
I have heard claims that people don't send their children there because of the name of the school..? I genuinely cannot get my head around this one. The school is named after the road it is on which is named after the history of the area! 'Grove Primary School' is potentially the most boring name they could have come up with, and for a school struggling financially, is rebranding the school really the best use of funds? -
By Forest Hill Climber · Posted
Certainly unique, can't argue with that.
-