Jump to content

The Lounge

The place to relax and chat about anything.

22,629 topics in this forum

    • 16 replies
    • 613 views
    • 6 replies
    • 893 views
  1. Bowel Cancer UK

    • 0 replies
    • 595 views
    • 10 replies
    • 730 views
    • 1 reply
    • 699 views
    • 3 replies
    • 621 views
  2. Poppadom

    • 8 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 27 replies
    • 1.4k views
  3. Unsociable teen

    • 0 replies
    • 160 views
  4. sibling rivalry

    • 11 replies
    • 651 views
  5. Juke boxes in ED

    • 3 replies
    • 516 views
    • 6 replies
    • 641 views
    • 5 replies
    • 625 views
  6. Decent pubs?

    • 8 replies
    • 648 views
    • 17 replies
    • 937 views
    • 15 replies
    • 575 views
    • 33 replies
    • 1.4k views
  7. Thai or similar

    • 4 replies
    • 618 views
    • 159 replies
    • 5.8k views
    • 49 replies
    • 2.4k views
  8. Alcohol 1 2 3 4 5

    • 105 replies
    • 4.5k views
    • 8 replies
    • 783 views
    • 22 replies
    • 821 views
    • 3 replies
    • 448 views
    • 40 replies
    • 1.7k views
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...