Jump to content

new bar application - Boho Bar, 52 Lordship Lane (Lounged)


Mark

Recommended Posts

Nearby Greetings and Somerfields, the old arcade is applying to be a late night bar. Application is to stay open until 12:30am Sunday to Thursday then 2am Friday and Saturday.


Does anyone know anything about Boho Bar or the applicant, Shenol Mentesh Ibrahim? What sort of place are we going to be getting? Spit and sawdust or Chasers? Manhattan or Croydon?


Full application details here:


http://licensing.southwarksites.com/LicPremisesAppliedDetails.asp?systemkey=828690

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A gentleman with the same first name and surname appears to run and/or be a director of the company that runs/ran the Scene Bar on the OKR.


Edited: to say that it looks like Scene may have shut down now and have been replaced by the fantastically named Xeus nightclub?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG I went to Adventure bar on Saturday - I had to leave after one. MOR Rock music (Bon Jovi and Elton John* to name 2 artists) played at such a volume conversation was impossible and lots of over-excited 20 somethings. Nice Margherita but not as strong as the one I then had in Licorish.


sorry - off topic. New bar eh? Just what we need\!!




* I do like some EJ but not what Adventure bar was playing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BoHo really does sound like a strip club. I really hope not - there are enough in the city. It would fail anyway. Personally, I'd love to see an Eclipse type place on LL (it works well in Wimbledon). We could do with something a bit more upbeat and open till late.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr MW74 and I saw a 50's style diner/pole dancing club in Brighton last weekend. The 'dancer' was dressed in a 50's style waitress outfit. Mr MW74 wanted to go in thinking it was a normal dinner. I had to point out the rather large pole in the window to him.


Maybe we could have one of those instead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like the breeders, even if their first major successes were ushered in by the demise of the pixies. Although it was inevitable that Kim Deal would find an alternative and equally successful outlet for her talents as they were often bullishly sidelined by black Francis.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do like the breeders, even if their first major

> successes were ushered in by the demise of the

> pixies. Although it was inevitable that Kim Deal

> would find an alternative and equally successful

> outlet for her talents as they were often

> bullishly sidelined by black Francis.


I was tempted to go along the Breeders pop group line myself, Brendan, and well done for going there, and that would be usually my tack.

But, I think that Josh's post was worthy of a mention for the quality of it's special air of ill-thought silliness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is breeding taking place in LL bar? Am I missing something!?


I noticed a lot of (sound) insulation piled up in the venue last night, so I'm guessing it's going in the bar/club direction, but that's a pretty loose guess.


Apparently, Adventure Bar is not charging for entry on NYE and will have a last man standing policy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well worth signing up to become a "supporter" as they send their updates and often shed light on things the council and their supporters would rather didn't get too much attention! https://www.onedulwich.uk/get-involved
    • Spot on...and they rant against "anonymous" groups like One Dulwich and then post missives from "anonymous" lobby groups like Clean Air Dulwich without any sense of hypocrisy or irony...
    • The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...