Loz

Really? I prefer the machines. They're very fast and efficient if you can use them properly.

Big(unlurked)Wolf.

I'd ring 101, just to be sure.

Have you changed the wireless channel, Jeremy? If you have a clash with a neighbour you'll get a very poor signal.

That's a 'spit roast', KK.

ultraburner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pfffth. > > I'd play a little less poker if I was you.. bad > for the heart. > > Agree with unlurked. Based upon what exactly? Your cosmic belief that little old ladies are never at fault? Awwww.

I thought they were usually framework contracts? So a number of contractors would be available for any given job.

Are you actually (grudgingly) saying something nice about the LibDems, unlurked?

"Coldplay?s Chris Martin has massive steak for breakfast" http://newsthump.com/2014/03/26/coldplays-chris-martin-has-massive-steak-for-breakfast/ ?Look, I?m sad about a Gwyneth and that, but at the same time I?m excited about the bright future I have full of steaks, burgers and kebabs.? ?Oh God, barbecues ? I can have barbecues again!?

I only heard the last 10 mins or so. Cleggy sounded too earnest (and a bit boring), but Farage sounded a tadge unhinged. Personally, I think the UK would be mad to come out of the EU. There's a lot wrong about the EU, but the advantages still far outweigh the disadvantages.

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I know its standard broadband - thats what the > poster- ianr was referring to when he/she > suggested > sharing your bb with poor neighbours. > Well, yes. that would be illegal. But you could have a mesh of routers and a leased line or two to the net. though, as El Pibe suggested earlier.

Is that official height, James? Whose waist? There's a bit of difference between Kylie Minogue and Peter Crouch when it comes to waist heights.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This news unfolded today during Prime Ministers Questions, when David Cameron was forced > to admit that a proposal was indeed being considered, but that he regretted that it wouldn?t > get support from both sides of the Coalition. This means an amendment has no chance of proceeding as > things stand. So, the Lib Dems quashed it, in other words?

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you read your terms and conditions you will > find sharing your broadband violates them. However > I don't think they ca tell as ong as you remove > all those cables / repeaters before the engineer > arrives. That's standard broadband. For something on this scale you'd probably want a leased line/MPRS link straight from a comms provider.

Their website seems to be based in the Bahamas. Curious.

Bit like chopping your hand off to get rid of a splinter, though.

northlondoner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Course it's not the wrong door. He was a "young black male". You can never quite tell tone of voice from the written word, can you? Sarcasm or racism? Hmmmm.

PokerTime Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We have to find a way to close the gap between wages and > living costs, otherwise the economy is never going to recover. Isn't is the other way around? We need to get the economy to recover so we can close the gap between wages and living costs?

aquarius moon Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The people who agree with fox hunting are the same > people who agree with shooting and other blood sports. I don't that is entirely true - or at least not in reverse. I have a big problem with an animal being chased across the countryside for half an hour until it is exhausted before being ripped to shreds by a pack of dogs. I have less of a problem with shooting, especially things like game birds, etc. Maybe it's a touch hypocritical of me, but I think there is a difference.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I do support a rise in minimum wage (regionally tiered), which will uincidentally further raise > the gap betweebn the very bottom any everyone else but I think our businesses by and large can > support this without losing too much competitive edge I've never understood why some people are against regional tiering for the minimum wage. It would (hopefully) push businesses out of the SE and up north where a) they are desperately needed and b) there is more (and cheaper) housing available.

unlurked Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The only people that want fox hunting are tories. End of. And your proof for that is...? And your explanation for the dozen or so Labour MPs that voted against the banning legislation is...? > Slipping your riding boots on loz? Don't like the very concept of hunting and I'm not a Tory, so no.

PokerTime Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't think Labour really think that. Me neither, since Balls has said he considered it himself. But, the rules of politics say you must oppose something and it seems there wasn't a lot in the Budget they could complain about. All Labour had on the evening of the budget was to be 'terribly appalled' at Grant Schapps' tweet, which was a bit of storm in a teacup itself.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > a poxy annuity paying me ?6k a year for ever ?100k in my pot!! I read (Guardian, I think) somewhere that the average pension pot in the UK is about ?30k. So your average annuity will pay out the princely sum of ?1800 PER YEAR.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > *cough* > > CLASS WAR......... > > Toff replacing the fox, that's what it comes down to for MOST who bang on about this....not Foxy > though, he genuienely loves the the mangy things Quite. The opposition to this generally falls into two camps. 1) Those that are more worried about foxes being chased around the countryside and ripped to shreds, like foxy 2) Those that are more concerned that it is being done by 'Toffs', like unlurked seems to. More power to the first group. I have zero time for the second type.