Sue

Just looked on Twitter, and they haven't tweeted with any news since 9th :(

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No one has attacked you. You were rude, end of. > Aren't you the woman who also a complained about a > van driver parked outside your house and admitted > you were rude to him too? You have you have a > habit of being a twat clearly. > > As for the rest I have no idea what you are > talking about, just as I have no idea who the heck > you are, and frankly I don't care either. You have > nice Christmas now, idiot. I wasn't going to respond to this and derail this thread still further, but I think I will. If someone wants to create a false identity on a forum, of course that is up to them. I'm sure it happens all the time. However if they do, they should be very careful to ensure that it doesn't start unravelling, particularly if they have posted on that forum before in other guises. Little clues slip out over the months, and leopards don't change their spots. Particularly if they have a great dislike for another forum poster and eventually can't resist having a dig and worse. I think it's a great pity it has happened on this serious thread. Perhaps it is time for admin to intervene. D?j? vu again.

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Over the line BB, in the cold light of day best > deleted? I think it should be left there. In her words, for everyone to see. I have d?j? vu.

Surely you deal with theft on an individual basis. If he knows a certain person has stolen fish, then he should ban that person. If he doesn't know who the thieves are, then on what basis has he put up this notice? Which btw is sexist as well!

That's disgraceful. I've just donated, and I've shared on Facebook. My daughter lives in Oxford and hopefully will share too. I don't know what the legal position is as it's a private fishery, though, and also I don't know whether "Polish" etc would be legally covered (I once knew all this stuff but I'm retired now, lol). ETA: My daughter is donating too.

Is there any techie out there who can help with this? I have an audio system which is a Cocktail Audio X10, which is basically a hard drive inside a box. I know this is rather retro :)) What is supposed to happen (and - mostly - has happened for years with no problem apart from the occasional glitch) is that you put in a CD and it rips it in whatever format you want (I use FLAC). It picks up all the information on artist, genre, year, track titles, album art etc as it would do if you were ripping a CD to a laptop or whatever. It's connected wirelessly to the internet via a dongle. A while back, after I had ripped one CD with no problem, the Cocktail quite suddenly completely stopped picking up the information, with every CD I tried. I did all the turning off/on, unplugging it etc and still it would not connect. I hadn't made any changes to any settings. (I know that I can enter all this information manually, but I still have a great many newish CDs to rip and to put all this information in manually would take me days and days and days.) Long story short, I identified that there was an issue with the network connection. So this evening, I put in the WiFi password again (it was already in there but I thought maybe it was wrong). I still got a message "Network set fail!!!!!" I looked at the network info and it said "Wireless network not connected." I looked at the wireless info and it said "Signal level 10% Link quality 10%" (I already knew the WiFi signal is bad in that corner) So I took the box upstairs and put it right next to the router, where the signal level came up as 100%. I still got "Fail connect network stream." In all these cases, the green i-service icon is lit up, which is SUPPOSED to mean that there is an internet connection. So THEN I connected the box to the router with an ethernet cable, and I STILL got "Fail connect network stream." So then I looked at the "Wired set up" on DHCP (Auto IP) and it displayed all the network information as it should do, but then on pressing OK it STILL said "fail connect network stream". Just on the offchance I tried to rip a couple of CDs and surprise surprise, no artist or track information. Please can anybody tell me what I need to do to connect to the network. I had made no changes to any settings or anything else in the minute or so between there being a network connection (as evidenced by the album information being picked up) and there being none, so I can't understand what can have happened.

OutOfFocus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > The Gowlett was the only pub I felt comfortable > going by myself and hoping to find someone > interesting to talk to. Not very near The Gowlett, but if you don't know it, check out The Ivy House - that's the only pub that I feel comfortable going to by myself. Admittedly I am biased as I have community shares in it and run gigs there, and there's usually somebody around who I know. But even if I didn't, it has a very friendly feel, and a very different vibe from pubs in East Dulwich. A real mix of people go there and there are lots of different things going on, from knitting groups to dance lessons to Sunday afternoon jazz. But I am very much hoping that The Gowlett will re-open.

Thanks from me too. We used this earlier in the year, and good to be reminded.

flocker spotter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > lets not make this into the usual perceived slight > pearl clutching exercise please. keep this about > the Gowlett Agreed. Sorry for my part in it.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > DulwichFox Wrote: > > > > > > "I have never drunk in the Gowlett. I went one > > > evening some time back. 8.00pm ish There was > Loud > > Music. > > > > The Gowlett was a run down backstreet pub > > struggling to compete. > > > > I never venture down that way late at night on > my > > own , especially when its dark." > > > > > > > > Do you ever read over what you have posted, > > Dulwich Fox? > > > > Dear oh dear. > > I do not need to read what I post.. I am very > careful what I write. > > There USED to be Police Notices on all lamp posts > Warning people that Thieves were operating in the > Area. > But the Loony Left had them removed saying they > were offensive.. > > If The Gowlett wasn't struggling.. Why DID it > close ??? > > DulwichFox.. > > P.S. Sue.. If you have anything to say to me.. You > can always say it on any of the several occasions > recently > when you have turned your head away as we > have passed in the street. > > You seem to be very quick to get your word in > on here. > > Are you just embarrassed. ??? I do not want to speak to you in person Dulwich Fox. You posted completely ridiculous libellous statements about me on here and have never removed them or apologised. And in any case, why would I respond to a forum post on here by speaking to you in the street? It's an online forum! And thieves are operating all over London, so do you therefore never go anywhere after dark? And what reason did the people you refer to as the "loony left", sorry, "Loony Left", give for removing the police notices you refer to? In what way were they "offensive"?

DulwichFox Wrote: > > "I have never drunk in the Gowlett. I went one evening some time back. 8.00pm ish There was Loud Music. The Gowlett was a run down backstreet pub struggling to compete. I never venture down that way late at night on my own , especially when its dark." Do you ever read over what you have posted, Dulwich Fox? Dear oh dear.

mrsmelodyhall Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > i do hope the dog is ok, what i hate more is that > the dog is a Staffordshire bull terrier i hate > irresponsible dog owners that give a great breed a > bad name, would love to hear from responsible > Staffordshire owners My brother has a Staffie. She is very sweet natured and always has been.

womanofdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I bought a roku plus in sainsburys dkh for ?30 on > Friday. Seemed very cheap for what it > was.😀 Thanks so much for that, I've just bought one there with Nectar points :) It came up at the till as seventy pounds, so they took a while to get that sorted, but it wasn't a problem. It's thirty pounds in other places too but DKH was rather quicker and more convenient!

:(

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have no idea who she is. For all I know that > might not even be her real name! But she was > uneccessarily rude to that poster. She was curt in > response. It is there for everyone to see. I was not intentionally rude. I think you know exactly who I am. And I think you know that I (and others) know exactly who you are. And you are showing your true colours for everyone to see. As you are well aware, I have always been "out" on this forum. I have always posted under my real name and can be easily found in real life. Unlike those who over the years have posted under various pseudonyms and in some cases go so far as to create false characters/"identities" for themselves in the belief that they are fooling people. Now why don't you just stop this personal attack on me right here. This is a serious thread about a serious matter.

PeckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yup, cause annoyance waste electricity radiation > etc. Some books would be good. But I asked once > and magazines can spread germs so can't do that! > And ditto life saved a few times there. I don't understand re the magazines. Kings' volunteers take them round to in patients. I take my magazines down there now since I found this out. They have an actual collection place for them.

We went to St John's, it was lovely. Planning to go to St Paul's for the late Christmas Eve service. Thanks to everyone for posting.

Thanks!

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Do you mean by 'online' via a smart meter? The reference to "online" above by yeknomyeknom (good name btw!) was in response to my saying "I regularly send them readings online" - so nothing to do with a smart meter!

6pm this evening at St John's if anybody else is interested. Thanks to LJC56.

Ok I'm looking at the Roku Express. Seems the alternatives will soon no longer get YouTube :( I am technologically challenged. My ancient TV has an HDMI input (good) but no USB port (bad?) Can I just plug it into the mains? The stick not the TV obv.

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That's a bit harsh Sue! Get up on the wrong side > of the bed today? > No. Did you?

Raeburn Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Picked up a small parcel from Sylvester Rd a week > ago for my gf. Only when I gave it to her did we > realise it had been opened/resealed and the > jewellery stolen from the box it was sent in. > > Fair enough they have a tough job being > understaffed at this time of year, but this isn't > going to endear themselves to customers! I hope you have reported this? Royal Mail used to have an Investigation Department to look at this kind of event and hopefully despite privatisation they still do have.

yeknomyeknom Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you do it online, the meter reader is > irrelevant. You don?t need both. Yes of course you do. Otherwise somebody could input false readings online indefinitely and then do a runner or else be in massive debt to the energy provider. There has to be an occasional external check.

You found a snake??!!??!!